Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. I don’t see this as satire. I see it as truth transcending time.The scenario may play out with a few differences here and there, and a few lies here and there, but one or two or a dozen or two lies are minor sins compared to the tragedy inflicted on peasants – poor peasants you know, not important powerful persons – and on their terrified children, up in the beautiful Hindu Kush, by the book-burning NZDF – under the same moon and stars which we all share.

  2. The real, question is, is Derek Handley being advised by Michelle Boag. Is there a right wing conflict of interest?

  3. No Bert, Derek Handley is/isn’t being advised by Michelle Boag because she’s not a real person and neither is Derek real,and I daresay Hager and Stephenson would have invented them had they been real people themselves, and if other person(s), not done so first, and in any case reality questioners are conspiracy theorists -ask John Key – if he’s a real man.

    Meanwhile, in Afghanistan, are the people the SAS terrorised – showing they were real men by sneaking up on defenseless women, children, and elderly folk, because that’s what NZ does best, we bully – and smash up our own women, children, and babies for practise. World leaders there.

    Its all a bit infra dig really – better swept under the carpet.

  4. 9 out of 10. But do I laugh or cry, or will my voice confirm my identity? If state actors ignore the law, why should ordinary folk obey it? It’s all hypocristroty.

Comments are closed.