Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. He betrayed the public and the judicial system with his sham ministerial inquiry into the Peter Ellis convictions. Utterly reprehensible.

  2. Yes, people thought he’d make a top notch prime minister and that it would last for at least four or five terms. However, the reality of it is that it’s never that simple. I think there was “communication” issues between Phil and some of the lower level staff at one point. It is a case of the man not being as mighty as the hype surrounding him. I don’t know him personally but have formed an opinion based on the opinions of others, that is that he has a very good intellect and I do wish him well too.

  3. Phil struck me as an inoffensive chap and 100% the politicians politician and has been amply rewarded for his service to the public.

    Blander than a beige coloured paper bag and was always a man to have a dollar each way and mostly fence sat. Whatever way the wind blew seemed to guide his decision making.

    I doubt he would have won this time around because just sometimes you have to take a stand on an issue and he never did as some of his Council Controlled Organisations did what they wanted to the detriment of the majority whilst trying to appease the cool liberal minority. Or conspicuous by his silence during Aucklands huge lockdown in 2021, seemingly blind to the problems it caused his fellow residents. Some agitation wouldn’t have gone amiss to shorten the unnecessary length of it but he was a good boy for Labour and said nothing! And Auckland was much the poorer for it!

    He didn’t do anything particularly bad, rather he didn’t do anything at all.

Comments are closed.