Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. Bomber, I don’t agree with your comments, she should not be coming. The issue has split the Jewish community and there is enough Anti semitic activity in NZ without her coming and encouraging more.

  2. Free speech is only free speech is you don’t mention the word Genocide with this lot and that’s what scares people like Deborah Hart.

  3. Candace Owens is a key member of the movement that John Key referenced after Trumps election win.
    She will be an important additional voice in the anti-Māori agenda being rolled out by the government. She is against any form of reparation and progressive policies in general and she is exceptionally confident, eloquent and articulate. Now wonder National want her in the country to add some spice to the big pot of racial dis-harmony that is needed to win in 2026.

  4. Her speech is not free speech you have to pay to hear her rubbish, best thing our NZ media could do is ignore her, give her no oxygen as they seem to do with all the problems caused by the CoC

  5. Actually the way to fan these grifters is by way of oxygen. People are forbidden entry into countries because of bad character,that what she is as she just comes to sow seeds of discontent and hate. I don’t agree at all with your evaluation of hate speech being free speech.

  6. Candace Owens criticism of Israel is focused solely on the harm done to Palestinian Christians living in Gaza and the West Bank. Not sure if she voices the same concern for non-Christian Palestinians. Still an an enemy of my enemy etc.
    More generally there are anti-war elements on the right the intersect with the strong anti-war sentiments on the left.

  7. Who invited Owens, who is paying her, who is organising the visit and giving her a platform? This is paid-for speech funded by political actors with a propagandist mission. This is not the unvarnished, good faith opinion of an ordinary citizen in a democratic polity. When we get teary-eyed about the sanctity of free speech (as we should), it is always that brave ordinary citizen that we have in mind – not paid propagandists.

    When the Right has most of the wealth and ownership of most of the platforms, they will use the defence of ‘free speech’ to saturate the world with their messaging using the megaphone of money. They seek not free speech, but the absolute dominance of their speech. We badly need a revision of what true ‘free speech’ actually is. To be free, speech must also be reasonably equally distributed. Time to talk about ‘free and equal’ speech

Comments are closed.