Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. It’s rather extraordinary to think that the UK Labour Party saw fit to take on such a garbage definition of antisemitism. It makes support of Palestine an impossible contortion. How anyone can think that any State can be put above the law and be allowed to break any and all humanitarian rights with impunity is the ultimate form of arrogant authoritarianism.

  2. Acceptance of the “international” definition is apparently a litmus test of nation states – a bit like the roll call at Flushing Meadow back in 1947.

    The United Kingdom abstained and then got out of the way so Arab armies could attack the Jewish homeland state – the attack on the UK Labour Party as anti-semitic until it accepted the “international” definition is a sort of revenge. As was the Breixt referendum result which ended Cameron’s time as PM – Cameron and Obama organised the Dec 2016 UNSC Resolution we co-sponsored. The UK is now more in lockstep with the pro Zionist US now. As is Oz.

    We and Canada are the nations in Five Eyes yet to be brought to heel via “white liberal guilt’ (more Christian and right wing nations buy into the Judeo-Christian civilisation thing).

    Expect to see Jewish groups here network with Churches and Moslems to bring in this standard along as part of a restoration of blasphemy law as part of the “more modern” liberal PC of Hate Speech legislation. They will seek to play Ardern, as a figure on the world stage, like a violin.

    If we give way, China will ask can they call criticism of them hate speech too.

  3. In nations applying this standard people are going to become dependent on local Jews or Israeli Jews to do the criticising of Israel. But like Chinese dissidents they could pay a price for this (loss of social credit – access to trains etc or forced abroad) – some Israeli historians have been forced to live abroad because of the threats of violence (and after 9/11 in the USA people who criticised George W Bush’s regime change plans for Iraq were put on no flight lists).

  4. But but but …. according to gobys right wing idol Ben Shapiro ,,,,,,,”Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewerage”,,,

    Later when forced to backtrack over the blatant racism ,,, Ben apologized for his slur against Arabs ,,, and said he meant Palestinians ,,, or Pals as he calls them.

    goby and andrew are the only posters in NZ who I have seen use this racist abbreviation for Palestinians.

    43 mins – 44 mins for the above quotes ,,, Start at 34 minutes for a ‘mosque shooting’ wider perspective.

    South Africa recognized it’s racism, but claimed its apartheid was good.

    Israel denies its apartheid ,,, and claims criticism is racist.

  5. Once again you have made a fallacious statement and linked to a disingenuous pile of propagandist manipulation of facts, arguments founded on false premises and reliance of distorted ‘legalese’ to support slanderous contentions. A brief scan of some of the the work of Adam Levick proves he is a skilled manipulator and fabricator of his own ‘truths’. Obviously these distortions assail the senses of people who obviously have knowledge and comprehension skills that are far superior to yours. Find somewhere else to spew you racism and invective.

    1. Apologies – this 3 December comment was intended as a response to Gabby’s, of the same date (above).

Comments are closed.