Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. Van Velden has had such little life experience it is no wonder that she looks either stoned or drugged… all the time..

    Clearly she is over whelmed with her portfolio. She would never have worked in any of the sectors that she is overseeing and is running purely on some warped ideology she picked up at university.

    Associating with an idiot like Seymour, and all the other lunatics in the ACT Party, would have entrenched her puritanical fiscal cleansing beliefs, enacted by disassociating herself from organisations such as unions, who could upset the programmed mental narrative that she obviously has running around in her head….hence the spaced out aura that surrounds her.

    One has to wonder what she does all day, and, what is going on upstairs, because if her performance in the
    debates, in the build up to the last election was anything to go by, there seems to be plenty of room for dancing up there….the only one to match her would be Seymour…Oh…and Luxon…oh… and Willis…oh and Brown …oh and Bishop etc..etc… etc …etc….

    These incompetent people are clipping the taxpayer ticket for many 100’s of 1000’s of dollars per year each They are the ones who should be ignored…they get to go….and they will go …very soon

    If Van Velden wants to be a professionally competent minister, or competent at anything, once she gets voted out in the next year or so, she needs to get herself out there and do at least 15 years in the real world to broaden her knowledge base…

    Then, and only then, will she realise the folly of her ways and how stupid she is being…..hmmm…maybe.

  2. Just another in the long list of nasty women in this government who are on a revenge trip of some sort .Maybe one of her former work colleges got a pay rise and she didnt because she was not in the union who knows .On one hand Luxon spouts on about building a high wage economy and on the other his minister is hell bent on destroying the work force ASAP .The final result will be more people living in poverty and businsess closure because those who are employed will have no money to spend .A low wage high unemployment economy just does not work .

  3. The non engagement approach goes way back to Rogernomics, when one of Rogers early actions was to end the “Joint Council of Labour” which was a regular meeting of the Labour Caucus tops and the NZ Federation of Labour–so you had Jim Knox and his key exec members meeting the Labour tops–which resulted in strong influence on policy in favour of workers. Rog’ Douglas was not having that when he was in charge! And neither are ACT going to have consultation with union reps.

    We know union density is down all round the world for obvious reasons–decades of neo liberal attack and to some extent the change in work to precarious hours, contract and self employed, but those that remain still have a lot of influence on the non member sections. “Freeloaders” and those oblivious to unions still benefit from wage floors and numerous other conditions that came originally from working class struggle. Holidays, sick pay, redundancy pay, maternity leave etc. all came from union battles–such as the 2 year Mangere Bridge strike which won redundancy pay.

    The CTU went MIA during COVID and allowed the SME/Service sector to grab the narrative…oh my poor Cafe…rather than promoting workers being paid direct from IRD rather than via employer wage subsidies. That being said, the CTU urgently needs a class left leadership and to be in everyone’s faces just like the young Māori movement. Lead by example and direct action not by press release.

  4. Bob the fart seems beyond any semblance of rational thought, so this is for general readers.

    Van Velden, one of Dracula’s daughters in the CoC lineup, with Nicky, Louise and Erica, is Min. for Workplace Relations which means…by convention she should meet with workers reps as well as employers reps.

    Think for a moment if a Labour Minister of Agriculture refused to meet with Federated Farmers reps…cow manure all over Parliament steps I would suggest and ute protests.

    But the point is workers, members or not, need to rediscover direct action, unite, and stick it to the parasite class.

    1. Think of ACTs donors and you will understand why Van Velden won’t meet with unions. It’s as simple as that.

Comments are closed.