Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. Probably not
    You can’t lead with the news when the majority of the population are actively avoiding it!
    I’m sure an alternative will arrive, just not in time for existing stars

    1. I don’t think you speak for “the majority of the population” – I know plenty of people who still watch at 6.

  2. Probably not
    You can’t lead with the news when the majority of the population are actively avoiding it!
    I’m sure an alternative will arrive, just not in time for existing stars

  3. By the time the “news” is on at 6pm, it is all things that i have read about during the day, and in the case of overseas news usually from a range of (sorry all you conspiracy theorists) MSM outlets. If I want a political update from the USA I’ll get a lot more from the thehill.com then I will from a 5 minute segment at 6:15

    I saw Samantha Hayes lamenting that they’d loved “bring me the news”. Except she didn’t. She and Mike McRoberts were paid I assume incredibly well for reading something off a teleprompter.

    I also find it hard to accept that the “senior political reporters” out there are holding the government to account. They seem to be more interested in “gotchas” that can be cut down to a 2 minute piece rather then anything of value. We have some good reporters in this country, and a lot of lazy ones.

    I feel sorry for anyone losing their jobs. I don’t wish that on any person. But the outrage and wailing and gnashing of teeth from people about this just shows that they won’t accept that people have moved on from huddling around the TV in silence at 6pm

  4. Well I’ve adapted to the dearth of real news, and by golly I don’t miss the advertising. The field is wide open for a disruptive model running factual reporting – it would clean Stuff’s clock too. But I don’t expect it.

  5. If their reporting had been balanced, we wouldn’t all be watching Sky News now.

  6. A nice little summary of TV-land in the 1990s that was.
    Let’s face it, television has degraded its product so completely that it has driven itself into irrelevancy.
    I always knew it was on the road to Destination Fucked, and here we are.
    They’ve no one to blame but themselves.

  7. AUT 2024 report- 69% actively avoid all or some of MSM news.
    I can see why TV3 are getting rid of it. Not a great way to increase audiences!

  8. AUT 2024 report- 69% actively avoid all or some of MSM news.
    I can see why TV3 are getting rid of it. Not a great way to increase audiences!

  9. I’m old enough to remember NZBC, and the change to BCNZ. I’ve watched with trepidation as the predictions of the Head of NZ journalism school have come to fruition. Following the failure of NZ journalists to challenge the mantra of rogernomics and ruthenasia, followed by the craven disgusting sycophantic acceptance of key and the knights of the business round table, the writing was always on the wall. Instead of reducing the coverage of sport and challenging head on the myths of neoliberalism, and showing the victims, the tv media joined the rush for the ratings war – a race to the bottom. The day of reckoning has come due in my lifetime. I for one, won’t miss NZ tv news – it’s long passed its use by date. I suspect TVNZ may continue for a decade or so, but will become a sports channel with the occasional propaganda thrown in.

Comments are closed.