Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

35 Comments

  1. Why anyone would do a sit- down interview with Seymore is beyond me..

    A clueless clown with a massive
    deluded ego desperately wanting attention …
    His stupid unworkable, poorly thought through blind ambitions, have all the hallmarks of a meglamaniac…
    His arguements are weak, and every time he is challenged he reverts back to irrelevant analoges that make no logical sense.

    He is simply not worth listening to, but the clearly the media haven’t got alot on, because every time you turn on the radio or tv ..there he his.

    It’s like ground hog day…every day!!

    1. Unfortunately Seymour holds huge sway in government, he was Luxon’s preferred coalition partner. How he gets to have so much power with 8.6% of the vote is a failure of our electoral laws.
      GPs are on the verge of collapse due to decades of underfunding yet National and ACT want tax cuts! – words fail me.

      1. I agree Peter.
        If you had just arrived in this country, you’d think that Seymour was running the place, and Luxon was his spin Dr.
        Hang on, I think that is the case.

      2. “How he gets to have so much power with 8.6% of the vote is a failure of our electoral laws.”

        What did you say when NZF anointed Jacinda /Labour (2nd popular vote party) with 7.2% of the vote in 2017?

    2. Have you got the ability to lead a political party and get voted into power.He and Peters are not my cup of tea but they should be respected .
      There was plenty of criticism of those that personnally critized Jacinda but it seems that there are different rules for our present leaders.

      1. The only reason Seymour is there is because the vacuous Epsom fools did a dirty deal and a bunch of billionaires used their money to buy influence..

        They know a peacocking ego looking for a massage when they see one..

        Seymour is the perfect conduit for what they’ve got in mind…

  2. A friend told me in December that she felt like leaving the country for the next three years. Semi-jokingly, I replied that she could return to a wasteland of armed marauders with everyone for themselves. That was before I watched the video above on right wing accelerationism. Now I believe it could be the prime goal of Act.

    1. Labour were creating a wasteland ruled by gangs and ramraiders. We now have given police back the power to arrest these people .Obviously if your friend liked being here under Labour she had better leave now as National are in for the next few years until Labour finds a spin and the Greens steal their voters

  3. A friend told me in December that she felt like leaving the country for the next three years. Semi-jokingly, I replied that she could return to a wasteland of armed marauders with everyone for themselves. That was before I watched the video above on right wing accelerationism. Now, in fomenting racial division & the running down of social services, among other destructive policies, I believe it could be the prime goal of Act.

  4. This is indeed interesting, and deserves more publicity than just this website. Please keep on the case. And the link to the fellow jailed in the UK for “walking slowly along the street” horrifying.

    And yet, if Labour/Greens hadn’t been so unattractively ideological, the election outcome might have been different: perhaps overstating as yet, but there’s that much-recycled quote “Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold . . . the best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity”

  5. This isn’t even aimed at corrupt NZ fatcats like Luxon who own eight homes, or the owners of large NZ companies.

    It’s directly intended to appeal to particularly unpleasant alien foreigners to sell them New Zealand citizenship, to become paper New Zealanders like Peter Thiel, the kind of lovely people who are enthusiastic about getting blood transfusions from nubile teenagers.

  6. Case in point – the recent MSD staffer whose horrible phone call with a ‘client’ about his accommodation made the headlines.

    With the cutbacks in “non-customer facing” staff, that means less trainers, less quality-assurance, less personal development & less counselling/support for case managers & contact centre staff.

    So people on benefits/social housing get worse service with scant training in customer care & de-esculating situations, and stand a great chance of ending their conversations with MSD/housing NZ angrier than when they began.

  7. What frustrates me most of the rhetoric specifically designed to make working class people vote and advocate their own intrest

Comments are closed.