Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

11 Comments

  1. There’s mainstream/legacy media that provide the news. From y’know – reporters and all. The rest is just commentary of varying quality. Mostly awful.
    So what happens when the commentariat can’t get access to news because proper media is gone. I know – they’ll just make shit up. Even more than they do now.

    1. “There’s mainstream/legacy media that provide the news. From y’know – reporters and all.”

      You’re just describing a form or a mode, which is quite independent of the quality of the content, meaning how accurate the information is.

      By your criteria, you must necessarily believe anything a “mainstream” “reporter” tells you, because that is the correct form of receiving information. But if you deny this, then you admit that such a source is indeed fallible, which means we shouldn’t take everything from such sources as the infallible truth.

      1. The advertising has moved to google and podcasts. As msm declines, even dies, the demand for accurate news will remain. If the bankrupt msm stops providing journalistic content to comment on then the podcasters may be forced to compete by breaking real stories themselves.

        Of course accurate news for business will be paid for. The wall street journal has more international reporters than any other media business.

      2. “By your criteria, you must necessarily believe anything a “mainstream” “reporter” tells you, because that is the correct form of receiving information.”

        Why on earth would that be true? That’s the whole basis of commentary I imagine, whether you believe the ‘facts’ or not. But my main point is that someone has to get in there and find out ‘what’s happening’. If no one does this the whole news system becomes a farce. The nonmainstream media simply doesn’t do it. They take what the MSM provides and elaborate or comment on it. Or often lie about it for that matter.

        1. Plus the often derided MSM media organisations provide a lot more fact checking, with some like Al Jazeera having a lot of resource dedicated to that. While most of them tend to have a bias (once again to mention Al Jazeera, they will have a definite view on what is happening in Gaza), somehow people dismiss them for that while at the same time slavishly following anyone on Youtube that has the same view as them.

          “Oh they’re just government stooges but listen to Jeffrey Sachs because he’s an unbiased genius that knows the truth(™)”

          Or this link on bitchute! It’ll tell you what they(also ™) are trying to hide from you!

  2. “network TV is retrenching to the point of fatally undercutting their good will.”

    lols, we are so well past that point.

  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjpYM3il4E
    This video shows FBI deputy director Mr Bongino is an honest straight up guy that we can all trust with access to our communications for the greater good, protecting us from enemy’s of the state, and bringing justice to corruption and the corrupt, from bottomfeeders to billionaires such as Epstein, that the FBI has provided cctv footage of his gaol cell with a crucial minute missing, and not a hint of anything amiss, except the faint scent of Chanel undercover agent cologne, momentarily lingering in the cell.
    Since Facebook is part of p.r.i.s.m, that shares info with U.S surveillance agencies, can’t the Coroner in the inquest of the boy found in the oxidation pond, ask the Wgtn FBI office, to recover Facebook messages through the p.r.i.s.m data sharing system, in the interests of justice?

    1. Trump first had relations with his current wife, on a plane called the lolita express, owned by Epstein.
      Even though Trump is heavily mentioned in the Epstein files, there are apparently hundreds of american secret service personnel who had nothing better to do, that have been engaged in cleaning up those files, so nothing will be released until any association to Trump is completley removed, which is why it is taking so long to release anything, as Trump and Epstein were best pals.
      It needs a patriotic whistleblower in the DOJ to release the unscrubbed files to the WSJ. Or some kind of independent inquiry headed by someone beyond reproach, someone such as Ed Snowden, to dig through the crap, and dig up the dirt, in a political swamp, inhabited by monsters and other rich powerful molestors. When it comes to honesty integrity patriotism and doing whats right, Snowden had these qualities in reality, while Trump has them in illusion. But Trump having a ball on the lolita express was no illusion, even though he had his own private jet, the lolita express must have had something extra special that was too tempting!

  4. The sort of longform journalist investigation and story that the legacy media outlets don’t do any more.
    (And they wonder why they’re failing)

    Exclusive: Threats, leaks and sex claims, how Khan’s Israel inquiry was derailed | MEE Investigation

    Middle East Eye
    3.18M subscribers

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfK1HboqSf4

    58,868 views Aug 2, 2025
    A major Middle East Eye investigation has uncovered extraordinary details of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting the British chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court over his investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes.
    The campaign has involved threats and warnings directed at Karim Khan by prominent figures, close colleagues and family friends briefing against him, fears for the prosecutor’s safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague, and media leaks about sexual assault allegations.
    MEE contacted the people discussed in the story for comment and their responses can be found in the full story: https://www.middleeasteye.net/big-sto

    P.S.

    It seems, from the evidence, that Karim Khan the chief ICC prosecutor, a married man, was having, or had an affair with his female staffer, inappropriate? Certainly. scandalous? Sure. But not that unusual. Julius Caesar did it, we forgave him, David Lange did it. We forgave him, Len Brown did it. We forgave him. Bill Clinton did it and we forgave him, Martin Luther King did it and we forgave him.

    In the case of King, the FBI found out about King’s affair and threatened to blackmail him, to not make his famous speech denouncing the US war in Vietnam. To his everlasting credit Martin Luther King refused to back down to the FBI blackmail.

    ….Despite the FBI’s efforts to discredit him, including the release of information about his affairs, Coretta Scott King stood by her husband’s side and continued to work alongside him in the Civil Rights Movement.
    The FBI’s surveillance and attempts to expose King’s personal life were part of a larger effort to undermine the Civil Rights Movement.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=Why+didn%27t+correta+king+divorce+her+husband%3F&oq=Why+didn%27t+correta+king+divorce+her+husband%

    All very topical considering the FBI are moving their office furniture into NZ and making themselves at home here.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-didnt-Caesars-wife-divorce-him-after-his-affair-with-Cleopatra

    https://www.facebook.com/Breakfaston1/posts/newly-re-elected-auckland-mayor-len-brown-has-admitted-he-had-an-extra-marital-a/10151895246152719/

    https://www.smh.com.au/world/hillary-clinton-explains-why-she-stayed-with-bill-through-the-scandal-years-20170912-gyfie8.html

    In the case of Khan it was revealed that Mossad had infiltrated the ICC and had uncovered Khan’s liason with his staffer and used it against him.

Comments are closed.