Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

29 Comments

  1. Another issue that the media will not tackle is the control invalid economics has over political issues. It is inadequate to complain about the failure of ‘neo-liberal’ economics. The whole of classical economics and neo-classical economics are failures, failures to conform with reality. Economics has the features of a religion. Joan Robinson in her book “Economic Philosophy” (1962) says “Economics is not only a branch of theology.” before explaining how economics has tried to “win itself the status of a science.” “Economists are the theologians of the 20th century, asked to give blessings and directions on issues of the moment. They are not unlike the monks of the Middle Ages, selling indulgences to the nation, poorly informed and often poorly trained, unaware their universal prescriptions are often based on narrow experiences and personal interests. If knowledge is power, the powerful demand the soothsayer support them, even if it involves a string of false prophecies. No wonder economics is dominated by fashion and evangelism, not teaching and discussion.” Brian Easton. 1992. The existence of the Prize in economic science in memory of Alfred Nobel’ does not make economics a science.
    The dogmas of growth, equilibrium, and the virtue of a ‘free’ market ‘efficiency’ appear like essential creeds to be held by a religion. Other ideas held by heterodox economists such as satiation, limits to growth, private debt criticality, thermodynamic laws, and chaotic processes are treated as heretical. Heretics must be ignored, censored and prevented from publishing. While religions appeal to strong positions of faith, (faith is evidence-free self delusion) economists rely on assertions, presumptions, assumptions, and just pretend. False assumptions lead to a false theory. All economic textbooks are saturated with the word assume and its equivalents and do not use real observed data scientifically to propose theories. Economics is not a science. Science is verified knowledge, verified by evidence. Evidence is acquired by observations, observations that are measured and are repeatable. A theory based on the evidence is improved by being able to make confirming predictions. Evidence is improved by using an experiment that would prove a false theory actually fails. If economics was a science it would not ignore discrepancies in its assertions.
    Orthodox economists (preaching”great moderation” and “the outlook is benign”) did not predict the global financial crisis of 2008 but were saying everything was fine. That failure proves their model is wrong. Economists show ignorance of double entry accounting, finance, banking, manufacturing, farming, differential calculus, system dynamics, thermodynamics, and physics. They should be replaced by the heterodox economists who understood economics better and did see the crash coming. Economists having sincere beliefs that are demonstrated to be wrong should not be influential in policy making.

  2. Martyn you can certainly google and look at discussion around the pro and cons of journalism fund in mainstream media. There was an opinion piece as recently as the 29th of March on the RNZ site. You might not like the opinion but is that the same as not being able to criticise it?

  3. Lets also not forget we are not allowed to call our health system a third world system that is actually worse the the USA Slovenia Cuba and Brunei on the world health rankings at 41st place 7 years ago. Thats before we even get started on Medicines funding. The number of people who are still blatantly ignorant of our health systems failings staggers me.

    1. I agree with the sentiment on the health system Geoff but I would think at least something is being attempted to fix structural problems and post code treatment. Of course removing a ridiculous amount of health boards does not address funding in the first place, but at least it’s not a case of throwing more money at a system that is full of duplication. Ironically there is more vocal opposition to such changes on this blog.

      Completely agree also with medicine funding. PHARMAC being the “envy of the world” is clearly not from a patient point of view ( unless you want your GP to offload about blisters of paracetamol). If you want an agency that controls messaging and spends a good amount on PR look no further.

  4. Martyn, watch the coming week.. it’s already started.. it happens to all governments.. – The Self-Implosion!

    Labour is beginning to eat itself!?

  5. Good post! An almost comprehensive list, but another that comes to mind it this one: you are also not allowed to talk about the cruelty and the failures of that toxic poison 1080 – the time it takes for an animal to die (up to 18 hours), the hammering of non-target species (such as the carrion eating NZ Falcon), the fact it hasn’t worked (witness the repeated drops on the same areas over many years), the divisions it creates in communities, the money-go-round that locks in millions of dollars into these operations and thus will never end because too many vested interests are at stake, and the suppression of legitimate scientific studies that proves its failures.
    You never could talk about it pre-covid because of all the above reasons as well as the neoliberal myth, taught in the universities, that if you were against 1080 then you must be for the extinction of our native birds. But you especially can’t talk about it now because the whole anti-1080 cause has been discredited and contaminated by the anti-vaxxer, chemtrail lunatics, and especially, almost single-handedly, by that crackpot Sue Grey.

  6. Another issue that the right wing MSM media do not mention are the low number of deaths in NZ from Covid compared to every other country. They hate to attribute anything successful to jacinda. Winner – Jacinda, Losers right wing MSM.

  7. I wonder why “Co Governance” is not listed here. Did we have a serious debate on it that I missed?

  8. You can add vaccines to that list. How dare people question vaccines and actually have a belief that as an individual they will not vaccinate. How dare they? Disclaimer: I myself do vaccinate.

  9. A first class list of prohibited or dismissed topics – just who do we vote for? And do not forget the battle for freedom of speech as Julian Assange is condemned to a slow death by appalling conditions of incarceration by a corrupt UK Judiciary and a decade of psychological torture.

Comments are closed.