Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. Control the medium and control the message. Has a ring to it. And surely its at the root of criticism against the influence of big business, big oil, big pharma, big tech and big government’s influence on the msm. No wonder it’s hard to maintain trust.

    At first McLuhan came to mind, the 60s insight that the medium shaped the meaning of the message. Think of a good many TV ads and how the images and narrative shape how viewers interpret the meaning. But on second thoughts, no, I think McLuhan was talking about something different. Control of the message by the rich and powerful is something else, as someone on TDB reminded us recently, Gramski I suspect.

    Does anyone still remember McLuhan 6 decades later? Or Gramski for that matter? I’d need to see the references at the end of the JMAD Conference powerpoints.

  2. “From the social contract theory trust has fallen because people don’t believe the media are upholding their end of that contract.”

    “Winston’s attack on the media is unhinged madness ”

    Winston held packed out town halls up and down the country prior to and during the election campaign and the msm didn’t report it.

    Then it was revealed the msm editors held a meeting to specifically discuss how to report on Winston. They chose reporting by ommission. A scandalous breach of trust with the citizens/readership.

    If they had reported his campaigning he may have attracted a more mainstream audience and be less beholden to the fringe.

Comments are closed.