Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

13 Comments

  1. Why are we all of a sudden claiming Winston Peters is the second coming when in reality he is a grumpy old man who sways wherever the wind blows. This foreign minister is a whole load of shit, look how blindsided he was with Rarotonga and China can someone please enlighten me as to what he’s actually done in this portfolio other than travel the world 1st class whenever he feels like. Plus telling other MP’s to go back to Mexico is a real lesson in diplomacy and sacking Phil Goff for a minor misdemeanor because we are feeding into the madman in the white house . Yea na !!!

    1. Agreed on Peters. He’s like some musician that once played stadiums but now plays dodgy piano bars with sleazy old bastards muttering into their drinks.

  2. I think that Fortress Aotearoa is an idea who’s time has come. In the early days no one but Muldoon got it. That makes doing anything today nothing but psychological torture and crushing Maori and workers rights the only thing to do but dwell on the past and all of its associated horrors.

    At the very least playing McGiver and Vietconging superpowers with drones and 3d printers on 3week research and development counters will totally fuck 5yearly military build ups and deployments globally. Which should be somewhat healthier.

  3. Sounds good to me BUT we need to spend that aid money right here and fix our own before we spend on other countries .How can we spend off shore while we still have poverty and people living on the streets .? NZ needs to become an independant country but never have a president type of political system .As we have seen more and more presidents become dictators and complete arseholes very quickly .

    1. Developing the entire south pacific is a non negotiable. There can not be an east vs west military build up in the south pacific. The responsibility to underwrite security has to be New Zealands and New Zealands alone if we are to have an independent/neutral or whatever the fuck kind of foreign policy dreamers come up with.

  4. 1% AID

    1% to our Diplomacy arm.

    3% to our military.

    (0.5% to our neutral merchant shipping fleet)

    The first task of our newly minted more muscular diplomatic arm would be to make diplomatic outreach through our embassies to lobby as many countries as possible to officially recognise New Zealand as a ‘Neutral Country” And then approach the United Nations to ratify this country’s neutral status at the UN with a vote in the General Assembly.

    To become a neutral country New Zealand would have to meet the internationally recognised requirements for Neutral Countries.

    To be able to continue trading we would have to invest in buying our own dedicated merchant marine cargo ships, flagged under our nation’s internationally recognised neutral flag.

    We would have to completely restructure our whole military and intelligence forces.
    No AUKUS pillar whatever, what so ever..
    Extricating ourselves from the 5 eyes international spy web.
    Recall our Orion and frigate from the Red Sea
    Close the Waihopai spy base
    End New Zealand in the biannual RIMPAC war games.
    Commercial contracts with all foreign weapons manufacturers would have to ended..

    To build a genuinely independent, military and intelligence force able to defend this country. The old Colonel Blimps whose perks include overseas junkets as guests of the Pentagon, would have to moved aside or retire, and a new echelon committed to this country’s independence swiftly promoted to replace them.

    The point is this: Without international recognition of our Independent neutral status, no matter how much ‘we’, NZ Aotearoa, spend on this country’s defensive military capability, it would never be enough to militarily defend this country in case of foreign military aggression.

    The laws of neutrality were first formulated in two treaties adopted at the Second Hague Peace Conference, October 18, 1907 and have stood for more than a century through two world wars.

    These treaties are:

    Convention (V)
    Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers on land.

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/2186561?seq=1

    Convention (XIII)
    Concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers on the sea.

    https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/727a73/pdf

    The 1923 Hague Rules of Air Warfare
    The Hague Rules of Air Warfare – articles 39 to 48, and the 2009 Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare.

    https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/S0020860400071370a.pdf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HPCR_Manual_on_International_Law_Applicable_to_Air_and_Missile_Warfare

  5. The NZDF needs to reinstate its fighter wing with at least F16s possibly F35s to integrate with Australia. Even more so if we send troops to Ukraine.
    No doubt the Putinists here are gnashing their teeth at the prospect of our army in Ukraine. If they don’t like it they can relocate elsewhere.

    1. Look I’m pro ACF. I really am. But NZDF have other more urgent priorities. I mean where are you going to get the some 600 extremely highly skilled personal to staff, train and maintain just 14 fighter jet frames from? Like from Seek??? These kids don’t exist. Most of you won’t even let your own kids drive the family car. Come on mate just ease up a little.

      If defence spending were to be maintained at 3% for 20 years you “might” get an ACF. Might!

      But by then we would have moved on from 4th to 6th generation fighter jets. It’s be like WW1 biplanes in amongst F16s. That’s just another reason why we should make the jump to drones. Drones just fits our culture better.

      By the way I’m not just talking about airforce Drones…, but that’s a topic for another time.

  6. We are a part of Five Eyes. We have no diplomacy. We do what our Five Eye overlord, the USA, says, and right now, that means Russia bad, China even worse, increase military spending to five percent, as the figurehead of the USA has been banging on to all its minions to do for near a decade now.

    When the school yard boss is weak, its minions must up their game to compensate for this, even though there is no other schoolyard gang on the horizon angling to take over the school. There is just a heck of a lot more students wanting to mind their own business. Still, there is introspection among the minions generating a lot of fearmongering that spreads like wildfire through the schoolyard gossip channels over the possibility of someone new arising from the yard to do to us, what we have always been doing to everybody else. This is where we are at right now, being asked, if not ordered, to dig deeper into our pockets in order to maintain the club, despite its weak and erratic leader, that has always ruled the schoolyard!

    Can a school function without a gang – are we even allowed to think this way, let alone ask this question?

Comments are closed.