Similar Posts

8 Comments

  1. Ten days ago, a New York judge revealed the full prosecution filings in a multi-state antitrust lawsuit against Google – one of many against the company, and of many more against the ad tech giants.

    https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/01/google_opinion_column/

    Highlights

    “There’s too much to digest in a handful of days, and early headlines have concentrated on the claims that Google and Facebook colluded in a cabal to deflect legislation, bypass privacy technology, and share the spoils. There are lots of specific allegations about other misdeeds; this is just the hors d’oeuvre.

    There are other charges in the 173-page unredacted filing, which you can and should read here [PDF]. If the allegations are true, the breadth and depth and sheer focused intent of Google’s abuse of its position would be unique. The perversion of the ad market would be intense.

    If you’re a publisher, your content is like a portfolio of shares you give to a financial institution to handle by judicious trading on the Stock Exchange, with advertisers choosing to buy through their own banks. Only with Google, the financial institutions and the stock exchanges are either owned by the same cartel, or they’re shut out of the market. This is hugely illegal in finance, for obvious reasons.

    How much does this matter? “Online advertising promotes journalism,” except journalism is dying. The money’s gone. Where’s it gone? Does Google have all the money? It takes up to 42 per cent of the cut from ad money that goes through it, alleges the filing, 42 per cent that can’t be spent on content providers like journalists.

    Without journalism, you get guaranteed corruption – fine for big companies that are keen to keep their dealings away from the public, and politicians and criminals who can entrench themselves in power and wealth, no questions asked. The big tech platforms don’t care about journalism, they care about traffic, so fake news tastes just as good and if the funding comes from dark money, so much the better – they get to keep more of the ad revenue.”

  2. Pffft. First thoughts: Oh how the 4th Estate has fallen, as I wonder whether or not to respond to a recommendation on LinkedIn to invite Tracey Martin to my inner circle. Incidentally, I must remember to delete that LinkedIn thing sometime.

  3. “Labour Party stooges pretending to be journalists” ??
    What about all the National and Act stooges pretending to be journalists? They are by far more widespread over various media.

  4. “Labour Party stooges pretending to be journalists” ??
    What about all the National and Act stooges pretending to be journalists? They are by far more widespread over various media.

  5. The control of public discussion by disabling comments on internet discussion by media outlets whose political “journalism” consists of simply repeating government press releases unquestioned, is truly disturbing.

    Watch the newsroom/stuff/RNZ propaganda cartel play the same game repeating each other’s opinion articles.

    There really is no leg to stand on when $55 million of their funding relies on media running government lines.
    It’s pathetic and simply mocked by laughing at them – one of the few reactions allowed to the people now.

    How can anyone be surprised that “journalists” are so widely despised? They are taking away the voice of the people, not enabling it to question government.
    Creating a less accountable government and less free society, the opposite of their supposed purpose.

    Heed the warnings of those who have lived in communist Eastern Europe or China.

Comments are closed.