Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

39 Comments

  1. I mean I don’t agree with Orr. But Chloe was part of the very government that put us in this situation, alongside the supply chain and Ukraine war issues. She’s just as responsible for the domestic side inflation as anyone in the Lab/NZF/Grn gvmt.

  2. The approach of the government to the inflation problem is not clever and represents a lack of thought for those they are supposed to bat for those at the bottom These are he ones to feel the sharp knive first but they are less in a position to weather the storm. An increase in accomadation benefit will go as rent rise to take advantage of the increase a tax break would be better helping bth benefituries and pensioners getting interest .

  3. It’s interesting. Adrian Orr feels as though he needs to manufacture a short term recession for the long term good of the economy. As usual, Chloe Swarbrick has an opinion but no expertise. She has a right to have an opinion, sure, but she is not in Orr’s position.

    As for Adrian Orr, his argument is fundamentally wrong. Manufacturing a recession by hiking interest rates, as well as specifically requesting that people spend less this Christmas, will only cost jobs, not create them. I don’t think we ought to be losing jobs in this country at this particular time. I see where he’s coming from though. I would say, maybe review it in June 2023 instead of forging ahead now. If we have a recession before the 2023 general election as Orr is wanting, I believe that it unfairly favours the current government whereas if we wait until next year then a fair general election can take place and any planned recession would occur after the general election.

    This is where the option of other forms of taxation comes into play. A wealth tax, for example, whether it be ongoing or a one-off levy, would spare hundreds of thousands of New Zealand citizens who would be worse off.

    1. That’s the point. An interest rate rise is intended to suck money out of the economy. That reduces economic activity and therefore reduces jobs. There really is no other option. The government is not going to reduce spending, or at least its growth, not in election year. Neither are they going to say “no” to any state sector wage increases. So the RB Governor has to do all the heavy lifting.

      In my experience, it is essential to take some tough decisions to reduce inflation’s impact. For instance, say to the state sector that there will be no wage increases for 12 months, and that the next one can’t be used as a catch up. That will reduce demand in the economy and therefore defeat inflation.

      In my recollection, there has never been a Labour government that has successfully dealt with inflation. It is always an incoming National government that has to do it. So the first two years of an incoming government is always a bit hard. Though it won’t be as tough as 1991. Ruth Richardson did overshoot in her zeal to restrain expenditure. I don’t imagine an incoming Luxon led government (should that happen) would go that far. Even after 30 years, the Richardson approach is seen as being excessive.

      1. Yes I do see your point here although a wealth tax would ease the burden on low to medium income earners. The transfer of wealth from Central government, essentially, to our richest citizens occurred during the pandemic and the poorest people lost jobs, tightened up financially, and there was more pressure on this Nation’s food banks and charities. Now we’re going to allow this same sequence of events to occur after the pandemic when were not printing money this time but trying to get it out of the economy now instead?

      2. Yes, indeed the Richardson approach was excessive and heavily criticised because of that fact. I don’t think it would do anyone much good if we entered into a similar political era.

  4. Where was Chloe when the government printed all that money to pay people to sit at home?

    Where was Chloe when the farmers had to leave crops in the field because the government wouldn’t let in contract workers from the islands. Islands that didn’t have Covid?

    She was there, cheering Labour on.

    1. Where were the decent wages to make farm labouring worthwhile for kiwis? Where was the decent housing to support kiwis to relocate to the regions to provide their labour? Where?

      1. Nowhere sinic, Andrew’s tribe went into hiding.
        Evidence? Bill English promoting a low wage economy.

  5. Ummm? Let me think?. . Who is in power? Who mandated the RB?… Who have allowed the poor to be poorer?.. who have allowed socialism to make the poor more reliant on Government? Who has allowed crime to expand unabated? Who has not fixed child poverty/housing…

    FFS the list goes on…

    Who has rooted and divided a once united country …

    Stalinda, Horseface, Jacinda, Stabcinda, Jaxunta,.

    Never in NZs history has one person’s inept ability caused so much disharmony!

    And many ” mentally challenged” people here support her!… Shame on you.

    As for Swabrick… If she had half a brain she’d be dangerous!

    She is in government blaming Orr yet should be blaming Ardern for not stopping their own self inflicted ” economy,” disaster

    1. @ Tarquin Quintan,
      “Who has rooted and divided a once united country …”
      Have you forgotten John Key and Bill English already?

  6. “As for Swabrick… If she had half a brain she’d be dangerous!”

    Well that’s 4 x more a brain than you weirdo.

  7. Tarquin Quintan, it appears Covid has entered into your body and Trumps hydroxychloroquine is your remedy.
    So many names for our P.M. To be mentally challenged you need a brain, lucky that most of us have one. You obviously fell out of the line when lining up for one.
    What an appalling opinion an immature beyond imagination.

Comments are closed.