Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. “This fiasco will end up empowering ACT….”

    Yup. I’m a lifelong Labour voter; but not next election. ACT will get my vote: at least Seymour understands what freedom of speech means.

    “Identity Politics would eat its own young if they weren’t all vegan.’

    Hahahaha! Nice: I wish I’d thought of that.

  2. “A University doesn’t have an obligation to shield staff and students from ideas that might trigger them”

    Maybe, maybe not Martyn but it IS a workplace and as such has a duty of care to staff & students alike

    If students themselves want to hold an event on campus grounds, you’d have a point. But why should that apply to EXTRERNAL GROUPS that have little connection to the University it self?? University management’s first duty of care is to the people who work & study there, not to others who feel entitled to use their spaces

    I fail to understand why that should be the case. Would you let white supreamists post whatever they want on TDB? I doubt that

    1. Can you please explain to us Mjolnir how a conference held by ‘outsiders’ during the term break when no staff or students would have been around would have been so triggering for the poor wee lambs?

Comments are closed.