Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

11 Comments

  1. “The reason non-daily Newspapers were closed was not an attempt to stop critical examination of the Government, it was to stop unnecessary movement and physical transmission of objects. That once every 3 day local newspaper stuffed full of junk mail flyers being delivered to every letterbox during a pandemic makes for a perfect vector for transmission and as such is a really bad idea.”

    That is the salient point.

    Martyn has nailed it 100%.

    Community papers can indeed go on -line. Some already are.

    Continuing production and distribution simply adds another hole in our lockdown shield. And all for what? Kittytray liner?

    No one is suggesting the msm is closed down (ok, except for Mike Hosking, please, for the love of Thor!), but community papers are not, by nature, an essential part of the Fourth Estate to scrutinise the guvmint.

    It may make us uneasy, and so it should. But these are dangerous times and we need to be careful how much we keep things open. Otherwise we might as well not bother and keep the economy open.

    But where will we put all the corpses?

  2. And you can get the local Rag (If you want to read it) online. Just google the name Stuff, Herald, etc and our MSM rears its ugly Nat empowering head. With its Right wing Journalists still praising the policies of Key and English to strip the beneficiary of their safety nets, and ruin the housing market for renters, but making it a Buyers Market.

  3. So I gather that extends to printed versions of MSM media? If not then that’s a pretty thin excuse….. Given too this govts propensity to challenge free speech using the Trojan horse of “hate speech”, using as a foundation laws imported from govts with dismal track records on human rights like France and the UK no less.

    Also if memory serves me from the same Labour party who wanted to strong arm voters by make voting compulsory a few years back. They have a bit of a heavy handed track record here, don’t they? Small wonder there are people who question their motives.

    1. No, Mikesee, this is not a “police state”. Not even close. (Thought the GCSB “reforms” certainly took us a step closer, and Police harassment of Martyn could be called that)

      We need to take this thing seriously. As infectious disease epidemiologist Jonation Smith said, the virus is unforgiving to our mistakes.

      Read his article and tell me it doesn’t give you pause for thought: https://elemental.medium.com/hold-the-line-17231c48ff17