Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

26 Comments

  1. Any person with a shred of common sense could have spent the whole $75 million in a month. Call for tenders for 100 quality homes. Build the homes. Invite 100 homeless families to live in them. Housing First.

    1. That’s patriarchy – Men building societies other men.

      It’s so stupid. I know. Takes an absolute genious level academically trained University professor of the humanities to be able to get 75 million and not spend a dime.

      But hey y’know. “Optics,” and “windows” and “overtone” form woke policy echo bunkers. And fuck weka.

  2. Or perhaps that money should be put to whatever is needed to directly get someone out of homelessness, and bypass the non-profit industrial complex.

  3. A very real possibility discussing the Greens post election will be purely academic.

  4. To be fair to Marama, yes, totally missing in action, but the big money promised in glitzy announcements by this government and the actual rubber hitting the road are two distinct things, the second if which rarely happens. Think mental health, think light rail, various transport projects, etc.

    When Grant claws back excessive taxes on fuel next month and doubles public transport fares to make everyone’s lives worse, just think of Chippys “targeted” assistance that replaces this to be just the same!

  5. Slight typo there bomber
    Hopelessness minister
    There I fixed it

  6. While we know that Bishop’s idea of getting money to the front line means that the government would be paying landlords more at least he is working for his supporters, Davidson does not seem to have a clue about who she should be helping or the urgency required to get a result.

  7. It’s a shame we have to see all this ‘listen to minorities’ when we have so many on the front line just doing.

    Salvation Army, BBM Foodbank, Auckland City Mission, Wellington City Mission, Night Shelter Dunedin, Dwelling Housing Trust, Project Moroto, Everybody Eats.

    If I can find them in 5 seconds why can’t Marama give them something in over a year?

  8. Baubles, bangles, hear how they jing, jinga-linga
    Baubles, bangles, bright shiny beads
    Sparkles, spangles, your heart will sing, singa-linga
    Wearin’ baubles, bangles and beads…

    Meh…
    It’s all Kismet anyway.

  9. Chloe was debating Seymour on the telly and she wants to tax the top 6% of the richest NZers $2500 each to go towards poverty. This equates to about a billion give or take. Apart from the fact that this would only pay for poverty motels for a few years, if a billion was spent at the same rate as the $75 million allocation quoted above, it would take a thousand years for the billion to be spent.

    1. The govt should hire consultants, they would go through a billion in a year

      1. Yes that the answer let’s get more Consultants to advise Labour & the Greens and they will chew through the $75 Million in no time.

  10. Shamefully incompetent.

    Yes give it to the people already delivering.

    If Grant gave her the money, surely she had a plan?

  11. You would think $75 million would be enough to get everyone out of homelessness, but unfortunately when it goes to certain woke causes, aka has to be identity based etc, then the money is not spent wisely and then more woke groups gets more taxpayer funded fortunes that they tend to spend on themselves or stupidly, and not actually getting any homeless off the street permanently.

    My friend who is Maori has people literally asking him if he is homeless and he is wearing a suit and drinking coffee in cafes! It is crazy, like they have all these people looking for Maori homeless but unable to identify anyone who is homeless (not generally in suits and drinking coffee in cafes!).

    Woke are paid to look for Maori homeless but don’t seem to have a clue! Other Maori I know, are not homeless because they always have their whanau and maraes, free dental and a lot of other health care, is included in their treaty settlements.

    Those who are homelessness on the streets are often because they are mentally ill or have major addictions and thus will generally be kicked out of accomodation if they are breaking the law with drugs or a problem to neighbours.

    I believe that many in state care become homeless, so that is something that the state should be working on as they seem to be doing a terrible job at looking after youth in their care.

    There are less homeless than people think, but there are many people at risk of homelessness aka living with relatives, in cars, floods etc but not much help for them if they don’t tick the identity box.

    The woke think money is going to do it, but skills and a workable approach is needed, not the woke impracticality and constant talkfests leading to stupidity.

    I posted how a 2 bed, 70m2 new build apartment in Auckland is 1.6 million dollars. This is the type of woke thinking that is completely out of step with the poverty they claim they are doing intensification for!

    Just like approaching random, well dressed, Maori on the streets and asking them if they are homeless! Woke cluelessness are an embarrassment to everybody and seems more racist than helpful – maybe they can offer them a new build 70m2 apartment for 1.6 million https://thegreenhouse.apartments?

  12. I’m sure you will find the rest will flow in a huge gush.
    Shortly before the election of course.

Comments are closed.