Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

41 Comments

  1. Chris’s nouveau riche vulgarity is more the domain of celebs than politicians from whom we expect a certain degree of gravitas and decorum. That first gleaming black Mercedes ride up Bowen Street was pathetic teenage behaviour; the bananas-in-pyjamas photo-op at Christmas, cringeworthy. The guy’s still performing like a soap salesman and giving salesmen the bad name they mostly deserve.

    Many kids don’t have pyjamas. They share a pool of common clothes and shoes. Locally, they wear new pyjamas proudly down to the shops. Luxon wouldn’t know that.

    Had he gotten rich doing something constructive like building houses instead of just buying them, or producing food, or inventing the jet boat, or operating on crushed accident victims, or writing a learned tome, he’d command more respect than being a bloke with bugger all to offer waffling that he feels other peoples’ pain like Meghan Markle does. If he equates having money with having brains, IMO he’s deluded and not fit to lead anything.

  2. “Those with a household income of $150,000 or more (48%) and men (42%) were also more inclined to say the Prime Minister was in touch.”

    Slight rewrite.

    Those with a household income of $150,000 or more (52%) and men (58%) were also inclined to say the Prime Minister was out of touch.

  3. Baldrick is certainly a klutz–and a nasty one to boot. The glare of his pasty bonce under lights puts off just about everyone. I guess his open “I’m rich sod you losers…” attitude is better than pretending to be “down with the ordinary folks”

    But the character of the PM makes little odds if you are under attack by MSD, the Food Bank is closing, school lunches are gone and you live in a van.

    1. Tiger Mountain. “ … a nasty one to boot.” Indeed. He should not have referred to New Zealand ‘have-nots ‘ as ‘bottom feeders’, in the way that he did. Muldoon would never have spoken this way.

  4. Luxon has no appeal as a leader, nor politician, nor advocate for kiwis.

      1. So given that he is the best choice for leader in the right camp and the all the rest have less talent then the ‘left’ have no worries about becoming road kill.

        Your intellect is underwhelming.

  5. When Luxury Luxon described half his fellow NZders as bottom feeders, I knew he was the wrong person. Firstly, he hadn’t checked the meaning of ‘bottom feeder’ in his dictionary.
    If anyone can be described as a bottom feeder, it’s him and his ilk.
    Maybe he’s forgotten the old adage, ‘It takes one, to know one.’

    Poor and petty decision making at his last job and desire to NEVER face tough questions in the hangar, after his first experience there, marked him as a person who didn’t like being told, You Are Wrong!

    I’m glad Mr. Hipkins is a nice fellow, that’s good. But we need more than that, from him. If he’s serious about staying on he needs to show us what else he can do, besides being nice.
    He needs a solid and brave deputy, such as Alysha Verrall. He needs to be uniting the left and taming the sillier elements of it. The public needs to see some definite progress because this constant diet of bombs being lobbed at so-called bottom feeders is not doing the left any good.

  6. Great picture but he should be on a double lead with winstone on one side and seemore on the other.
    On another note I see the COC is trying to bully the Wellington Council it’s the COC who have damaged our city with their bullshit water that does not work policy (just transferring debt that still has to be paid) dismissing thousands of public servants who spend money on the local businesses, no investment in public transport and cutting the public transport subsidies to name a few. Now the COC are trying to do stand overs cause some of the dummies in Wellington who voted for them are crying like babies cause their rates have to go up, but these people were forewarned this would happen.

  7. MB- I think the lunch conversation you wrote was too intellectual for either of them. It would have been more like this-

    CL: “…..” (click)
    DS: “…..” (click)
    CL: “…..” (click)
    DS: “…..” (click)
    CL: “…..” (click)
    DS: “…..” (click)
    CL: “…..” (click click)
    DS: “…..” (click click)
    CL: “…..” (click click click click click click)…

    Both too busy sending selfies.

  8. Not convinced that Luxon needed all that much persuasion to give ACT what it wanted. (Saint) John Key had the ACT vote subsumed within National and ACT leaders (Banks, then Seymour) on life support with the so-called “Epsom arrangement” and way less than 5% of the Party vote. The two parties are very aligned in lots of areas and ACT is a convenient vehicle for saying what National really thinks while maintaining the fiction that National is centre-right, rather than just plain right-wing. (It’s Labour of course since 1999 that has been the actual centre-right party in NZ.)

  9. At least John Key was a clever bastard, Luxon is just a bastard. Apart form Uncle Tom Reti, the National party seem to be of very average intelligence. When they give interviews it’s like listening to teenagers. They know the cost of everything but the value of nothing.

    1. Funny your say that . Simeon boy Brown is one of average intelligence. His interviews always have the tag line “I’m just awaiting official advice”. In other words “I haven’t a clue what to do”.
      The little intelligence he has is that by using that tag line he absolves himself of any responsibility and will lay the blame at his officials feet.

  10. Why do you think that Ada. I am sure we would have a far better country if we had inspirational leaders who could take both sides of the political spectrum.
    One just has to look at the bland leaders since Norman Kirk with the exception of short spells from David Lange and Jacinda Adern to see the lack of progress and cooperation good leaders can achieve.
    Unfortunately Lange was shafted by Douglas and Prebble. Adern was handbraked by Peters and Jones.
    Add these four blokes into the mix of Bolger Shipley Clarke Key as leaders and you have what we have today. A PM who is a absolutely abhorrent human leading a bunch of racist uncaring money driven people.
    If we had had decent leaders who could actually lead we would be far better off economically and socially.

      1. A little thing called Covid!

        Her inaction to keep businesses alive and people employed was astonishing(sarc)

        Contrast today and NZ is the opposite run by an incompetent.

  11. Where did having ones of the World most charismatic leaders get us or the poor sod that put faith in her leading them to a better land of socialist paradise

    1. remember when you and your white supremists were attacking her and her kid along with saying the Maori were stealing the water thats what happened .Then you all voted for this pack of magots and now look at what you have done .You have consigned a whole generation of kids to the scrap heap .Even your little rich prick darlings will feel the force you have unleashed for the next 3 years .

  12. Of course those that are really on top of understanding economics at govt level know that if National/Act had been in control during the pandemic years there would be no inflation, no high interest rates and no increase in living costs whatsoever…….Yeah Right!!

Comments are closed.