Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

4 Comments

  1. https://segm.org/Italy-Puberty-Blockers-Therapy-Bioethics
    The fact is these drugs have lasting effects on people who are still developing (both sexually and mentally) because they are underage. The massive issue is that these drugs can cause permanent sterility which is obviously irreversible if you come to change your mind (as you get older and mayhap grow into your body) about your “gender identity”. I, for one, fully support the banning of these drugs in minors.

  2. Prescribing them for gender dysphoria would never have been legal had not our legal system been penetrated & co-opted.

    The UK Supreme Court has reversed some of the more egregious excesses, but NZ is trailing the UK, and it is still for the moment legal to lie to children that changing sex is possible, and further, that it can ever be desirable.

    It will take a while to extract the responsible fanatics from their undeserved sinecures, but public support for the lies is zero. Trans advocates have chosen to make themselves pariahs.

  3. Puberty blockers is only part of the argument is seems. The whole caboodle is contentious and always heated to say the least.

    Some DB readers may have seen this, although most likely not in msm. The view presented is vehemently anti-trans identity – well, the author does concede a kind of ‘live and let live’ attitude but not in the so-called protected spaces that biological women have set aside for them – and by association is against puberty blockers – but real message is perhaps pushback against what the author see as woke capture of the trans-identity space and its implications for free speech (in the context of journalism). I thought the author has a point. And in that regard – and its distain for the woke – it shares something in common with MB, but perhaps that’s where the resemblance ends.

    Reposted here with the authors stated permission. Usually behind a paywall but as its an Open Letter to Minister of Justice, Paul Goldsmith, its free, as are three other articles on the topic the author has penned. Make of it what you will, whatever side you take – if indeed that’s your preference.

    https://justthebusinessjennyruth.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-justice-minister-paul

  4. I think that it is dangerous to go banning things too much. Lessen use, insistence on counselling, talking and discussing with others of same age, and transitioning without blockers, and see if the freedom to consider them in a year or two will allow less concern and relaxation of mind to become certain. Just because some activist gets stirred up and reacts to someone else’s situation and attempts a takeover of their inner being is no reason to give such individuals rights over the vulnerable.

Comments are closed.