Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. I’ve never seen any basis to believe anything Claire Tevett has ever written. She is a National Party shrill.

  2. IMF gets a new meaning, if Key gets the job, called the ‘I (am the) Monetary Fund, how fitting, the spin continues.

  3. Perfect job for JK the IMF supposedly wrote the economic prescription for NZ which Roger Douglas and the Labour Party introduced for NZ, we went from No 1 in 1975 in the OECD to No 26 in the OECD in 2014.

    The IMF are not all they are cracked up to be, the world monetary system is in a shambles?

  4. Saying Key is “named as ideal candidate to head International Monetary Fund” or saying he is “tipped” for the job is nothing. It’s jumping to conclusions, interpreting what was written in a certain way and making inferences and repeating them that is the problem.

    That’s the bullshit bit.

    Today deliberate perverting about charter school school results has become evident. That’s not down to the public misunderstanding, being gullible, lack of critical reading or making wrong inferences, that’s down to straight propagandising. And that is bullshit.

  5. Pete: “Today deliberate perverting about charter school school results has become evident. That’s not down to the public misunderstanding, being gullible, lack of critical reading or making wrong inferences, that’s down to straight propagandising. And that is bullshit.”

    Spot on. And this is a fundamentally important story.

    I don’t care a damn about wossname, what he does or where he goes. It is of no moment to any of us. Forget about him.

    But I surely care about the charter schools! Many of us were sceptical about reported results, having doubts about the extent to which such schools could make such a difference in so short a time with such children. It hasn’t happened overseas, after all.

    And it turns out we were right: put simply, we’ve been lied to. And a bucketload of our money has gone into a lie. That had better be an election issue.

    1. Even David Seymour, whose party was responsible for Charter Schools couldn’t defend the differing standards used to measure the “success” of Charter Schools vs State Schools. The best he could come up with was some rubbish about “old” vs “new”.

  6. I suspect the gushy sycophants at the Herald so wanted to believe that the world admires John Key as they have, and dream of him stepping onto the world stage just like Helen Clark, that they are perfect dupes for this kind of story that, from a Left perspective had all the credibility of reports of WMD in Iraq, or victory for John and Max on that goddam golf course.

Comments are closed.