Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

22 Comments

  1. what is happening with dowie she needs to be charged we can’t have one law for national party members and another law for the rest of us it not fair. Its her parties law they made it.

  2. Judith Collins is a joke candidate with a crazy platform and zero charisma that is as likely to be elected as Donald Trump would be in the US. Oh wait.

  3. Pleeeaase stop downgrading Simon. We need him.
    The nats just might possibly find someone else with a personality and an IQ. Long-shot though.

  4. Bridges’ strangest response was that this wasn’t about him, it was about the National Party. WTF?? So is he or isn’t he the leader of the National Party?

    If Bridges can avoid responsibility for leadership of HIS OWN PARTY, what signal does that send to voters about his willingness to take responsibility FOR ANYTHING??

    Once Guyon Espiner or Corin Dann notices that comment, Bridges will be hung, drawn, quartered, and roasted on a spit.

    1. Well, bear in mind that Mrs Bridges says she’s seen hubby performing in court and that he’s “a dirty little street fighter.” That’s his good side…

    2. And they will sacrifice Bridges happily, knowing that it distracts from what is a true statement, albeit an inadvertent one.. Namely that it is ” about the National Party”… The whole organisation is rotten to the core, and that is what E(spinner)and that other toady will work strenuously to keep out of print, and broadcast news…

    3. Yes , in his ‘capacity of being the PM yet not the leader and at that particular time not the PM’…

      Keyisms…

      Who needs them.

      Especially when the Serious Fraud Office is now involved….

  5. If at the end of a SFO investigation we NZers get the usual “We(the SFO)could not find any evidence of fraud committed by the NZ National Party” then we can be well assured it, the investigation, was just a formality.

    It usually ends that way i.e no evidence; when it comes to mostly politicians. The ordinary person in the streets of NZ who may have done the same thing would be dragged over the coals and perhaps into prison. The politician(and former politicians)keep their knighthoods and positions(if still an MP). It shows the injustice of the justice system that favours the wealthy more so than the poor.

    And at the end of the day, as one would say, it will be naturally the NZ taxpayers who will be left the bill(s) of the SFO investigation(s).

    Still I guess in an attempt to divert attention away from the fact National have partaken of some rather devious tactics over a long period of time we will be assailed instead with how bad for NZers the CGT. And before we know it $100,000 in misleading advertising by National will have been spent and Bridges will say to the SFO “What $100,000???!!! I never saw $100,000. JLR is just imagining things yet again!!!!!”

    1. Just me

      Why don’t you ‘slither’ back to the national Party rathole.

      We know how National can never win without playing dirty politics as they have made an art of it so you can now see their reputation now is catching up with them and no gleaning of that turd can ever camouflage your attempt to pater that filthy National Party wall of jericho.

  6. Must say though., Jamie Lee has heaps more charisma, political persona and political nous and apparently intellect than Simon. Ethics seem to be on a par though with the Nats and ACT . Given those attributes he should be the leader. of the National party.. He’d be more acceptable than Judith…..seriously

    1. I thought exactly the same, during and after watching JLR speaking to media yesterday afternoon.

  7. Paula claims the allegations are not all that serious. But the SFO only undertakes an investigation if there is strong evidence of a serious level of misconduct.
    Maybe there is a sub-branch dealing with it – NSSFO Not So Serious Fraud Office

Comments are closed.