Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Class all the way folks for sure.

    Jacinda wants climate change addressed & roads wont do that!!!!!

    National are running now on spending $10 Billion on roads???

    Today National was trying to sell another round of road building as they are now closing regional rail down!!!!!

    Silly simple National = more roads more road pollution.

    Trucks use 32 tyres.

    Trucks use 8 times the fuel as rail does to move one tonne one km.

    National plan result is;

    More carbon emissions.

    That will cost us as the cost goes on “Carbon tax” in future.

    No more roads for cars/trucks. = “road runoff” pollution from diesel, & tyre dust pollution & stock effluent washes off roads into our rivers, lakes, and aquifers, and finally our drinking water.

    More rail is the way. = Rail has no tyre pollution. ail uses far less fuel and we have less trucks on roads to wreck them and kill many of us.

    it’s a no brainer right!!!!

    Jacinda; next time the nat’s (Joyce) try and corner you in a square off, just ask them, “what other assets of our taxpayers are you planing to sell off in your next term if you are returned”??

    1. Thanks CG for pointing out the issue of tyres. Modern tyres are made of synthetic rubber, which is made from oil, so maintaining a supply of tyres currently depends on the fossil fuel mining industry. Tyres produce pollution at every stage of their product lifecycle, from the mining of oil, to the synthesizing of the rubber, to the manufacturing of the tyre. At their end-of-life they create huge piles of unrecyclable toxic waste.

      Building and maintaining roads also requires huge amounts of fossil carbon, and roads are constantly seeping toxic waste into the surrounding environment. I can’t see how any of this is sustainable in the long term.

      These are issues that electric car advocates tend to ignore. At some point, we will need to replace both road trucks and buses, and private cars, with an integrated electric rail system that can move both freight and people, both between cities and within them (driverless urban rail cars?).

  2. And thank you, John Key, Sir now, for having helped destroy the remnants of the New Zealand media landscape, where investigative journalism is almost dead, and where others now judge about appearance, aspirational slogans and charm, as that is all that matters.

    The Gen Y – and also slightly older ones – seem to love it, Jacinda is here, Jacinda is here, we will win now, policy can always be made up on the go, after 23 August.

  3. Not bad, so we will see what the contents is in the coming weeks, so I hope, some clear and dedicated policy, thanks. Tony Blair was a good speaker also, hence his initial success. Deeds are what will count, but a change is overdue. She has her eyes on the Green and NZ First voters, and uniting them under Labour, that will possibly pull this thing off, I feel. Voters like unity and strength, at least many will feel that is what is coming.

  4. ‘We will take climate change seriously because my Government will be driven by principle, not expediency. And opportunity, not fear.’

    Words come easily to politicians. Action does not.

    We are in the early stages of a global abrupt climate change event that is the consequence of the use of fossil fuels. And the only way to prevent runaway overheating accelerating is for the world to abandon fossil fuels….which would lead to immediate collapse of industrial civilization (collapse of industrial civilization is inevitable any way, of course, but will happen somewhat more slowly if the use of fossil fuels is continued to the point that they become difficult to acquire).

    At this very late stage in the game there is no way out of the progress trap we find ourselves, the progress trap that is a result of the very, very bad decisions made by politicians in the past; very, very bad decisions made by people like Helen Clark.

    https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/wp-content/plugins/sio-bluemoon/graphs/co2_800k.png

    Multi-metre sea level rise is now locked in, as are increasing drought and torrential rain episodes, as we march towards self-annihilation (well actually our children and grandchildren’s annihilation) that is the natural consequence of gross overconsumption of fossil fuels.

    But don’t ask New Zealanders to give up their extraordinarily affluent lifestyles – extraordinarily affluent by the standards of most nations on this planet and by the standards of history]. Don’t point out that current economic arrangements are a gross aberration in the grand scheme of things, and that current economic arrangements have no future because of declining energy availability and destruction of the planet’s stability, e.g. the lowest Antarctic ice cover since records began for the time of year.

    https://ads.nipr.ac.jp/vishop/#/extent

    Don’t challenge the ‘rights’ of banks and corporations to set the agenda of nations. And don’t challenge the industrial-military-financial complex that governs the policy of the biggest rogue state on this planet.

    In other words, nothing will change politically or economically in NZ until massive change is forced on the ignorant and stupid masses and forced on the ignorant and stupid political machine by collapse of the energy system……an energetic collapse which is underway and which will accelerate: ‘we’ will continue to destroy our progeny’s futures for as long as ‘we’ can. And those under the age of 60 will continue to destroy their own futures for as long as they can…….as required by the global corporate system.

    Indeed. these are ‘interesting times’ (Chinese curse: ‘May you live in interesting times’.) because industrial humans have already ‘fucked’ this planet a dozen times over, and they have no intention of relenting.

  5. Couldn’t help but notice the way she referenced Lange and the nuclear issue, but failed to mention anything about Rogernomics, or the fact that most of the contemporary issues she railed against (and rightly so) can be traced back to the government Lange led. A missed opportunity to publicly denounce the hijacking of Labour (and Lange) by Douglas and co as an aberration that won’t happen again.

    That said, nothing else she said sounded Rogernomic, or even Blairite. A number of the things she said totally clash with neo-liberal orthodoxy. Especially “education is a public good, and that’s why it should be free”, and “I will always maintain that a successful economy is one that serves its people. Not the other way around”. I like the way she was able to include some policy detail in a half hour speech, without being dry or technocratic. I’m not breaking out the bubbly (or the buds) yet, but overall, I have to say I’m impressed.

Comments are closed.