Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

21 Comments

  1. Labour knows that raising benefits enough to lift our poor to a decent living standard is an election losing strategy just like a CGT or wealth tax. Middle NZ is greedy and entrenched in Neo Liberalism. Yourself is first in every way, fuck the poor. Proper Natz mantra is embedded in culturally and can only be changed at your peril.
    Hence Labour party doing nothing, all talk no action. NZ is not ready for change, yet. Votes are more important than poor people. At least a couple more election cycles yet, before Middle NZ is dominated by less conservative voters and big changes can be tolerated.

    1. That just says the $60 billion the government is borrowing isn’t good enough for the poor and disadvantaged when we know that targeted social spending creates a 1 for 1 gdp growth. In other words for every $6 dollars spent on infrastructure, it creates 1 dollar in GDP growth and for every $1 spent on targeted social spending creates $1 in GDP growth.

  2. I’ve never believed in the ‘identity politics’ B.S. Its always been a false flag and its no wonder it has spread like cancer the more neo liberalism has become entrenched both here in NZ and overseas. It is a convenient tool , – to divide people, set them against each other and provide endless ‘ issues’ whereby the B.S never ceases, meanwhile we as a society become pitted against each other, and those in control can sit back laughing at us all as ‘the plebs’ fighting amongst themselves like a rabble.

    Its no different from Rome’s ‘bread and circuses’.

    It has absolutely NIL to do with left / center left issues like egalitarianism, and equity leading to a stable and good quality of life for its citizens,… but EVERYTHING to do with being a diversion, a distraction and a divisive tool to keep society’s lacking in any cohesion that may create unity and thus exposing the real motives behind it.

    Its political. And its motivated by big business interests. That’s all. And its also motivated by its close cousin, political power.

    And sadly, this is also why this govt is so roaringly silent on the colossal and most basic human rights issues that confront the people of this nation each and every day. They may have a ‘kind’ face but that is tantamount to being more than useless when people and family’s are homeless, hungry , poor and ill. And as a reminder to this govt, – WE, under THIER collective neo liberal govts, and auspices,… signed the U.N declaration that EVERY human being has a right to a warm , dry and stable home.

    I think you can see where this is going.

    I lump Labour in with National. Equally as useless, and equally as callously indifferent – barring great shows of ‘humanity’ when disasters hit for political gain only. So what?, – Winston Churchill showed more backbone than any of these ever did or could, and he was doing it out of a genuine concern for his country. Not so these. They don’t care about the actual people of their country’s, only maintaining the economic status quo. And controlling the narrative so unity and exposure of them does not happen.

    Ever since 1984, every successive govt in NZ has been mere window dressing and a false front for big business interests. No matter what political party is in control. All they ever do is pass the baton, some doing the big ‘hard line’ thing, – the other doing the ‘softly softly approach’ to keep the chickens from getting restless.

    And one of the major tools used is ‘ identity politics’.

    And they are laughing at us, – the suckers, the plebs . And so are their international big business, party donating associates.

  3. “Labour are notoriously timid when it comes to challenging the neoliberal structure “……because it works.

    The last thirty years has seen a steady reduction in global poverty through neoliberal trade and economic policies. The only countries today that aren’t lifting themselves out of poverty are those that aren’t neoliberal in outlook.

    1. Absolute rubbish.

      The Scandinavians have not and never will embrace neo liberalism wholeheartedly, and globally are the most wealthiest per capita, while the poorer places round the globe like many states in Africa have accepted Chinese / CCP’s Belt and Road overtures because they have received ZILCH from western neo liberalism except poverty and exploitation , – or worse, – deliberately been ignored when suits.

      The USA, the supposed home of the free market,- practices protectionism of its own farming and industry btw, and regularly uses the Reserve Bank to bail out its capitalist banks. Recall ‘too big to fail’ and ‘ corporate welfare’ back in 2008? Yet the USA has huge homelessness and poverty issues despite its wonderful free market reputation. And how many country’s populations including our own have become massively the poorer since Douglas’s free market lies? Why do you think this so called ‘Left’ govt is copping so much flak for its do nothing track record ? Because essentially, it is a neo liberal one not a Keynesian one. It forks out to corporate welfare but does very little to improve the lot of workers, the poor , the homeless etc.

      So you cant even criticize this govt because it too, like National and ACT, have their foundations in free market neo liberal capitalism on steroids.

      So don’t be a Noddy and try to make sweeping generalist and simplistic statements. The fact is, that in 1967, NZ had the 6th wealthiest standards of living globally- just after Denmark. By contrast, after Douglas and his traitors, the spike in crime was horrific, as were the unemployment figures and along with his Mont Pelerin mate R. Richardson’s Employment Contracts Act 1991, – NZ workers wages and standards of living went from being among the highest in the world to a little while back, – being compared to Albanians’ and described by Key and Warner Bro’s as being ‘Mexicans with cell phones’.

      And there is some truth in that statement, – as NZ went from the 6th highest to 32nd a few years back , – behind Mexico.

      There’s your neo liberalism for you, – poverty, homelessness, overpriced foods and third world wages in a nation that once was one of the wealthiest .

  4. The main stream media has convinced all who didnt beleive there is a housing crisis that Labour cant fix it. Its a no brainer that a department of housing needs to build 100,000 or more state houses. (Just as Shearer promised Labour would do ten years ago). What is wrong with them? Print the money. Appoint an extremely competent housing czar. Issue the regulations to clear their path. Dont say Lets Do This. Just get it done. Youll reap a generation or two of Labour supporters.

  5. I think you will find in all countries the rich have got even more richer and inequalities have risen since the Covid not just our little country, all countries.

  6. I wouldnt expect a czar from the Labour Party itself they may be a labour supporter or not. They would be someone with the experience to plan organise and run a commercial operation because thats what building 100,000 houses is. There is no doubt a highly competent kiwi amongst the team of 5million with the capability, acumen and desire to do this job.

  7. Two good articles in Herald today reinforce govts neo liberal drive in the wrong direction.
    ‘Why is Labour government trying to push through a two tier benefit system’
    ‘Overwhelmed ACC workers dropping like flies’.
    ‘What’s going on?’ Marvin Gaye

  8. “Inequality has exploded under Labour – is the egalitarian dream dead?”

    Yes @Martyn, I’m afraid it is. It’s been overtaken by marketing the message with $300m worth of bullshit artists in this virtual realty space (going forward).
    My suspicions are that it’ll just have to play out with all its casualties. Blinded by nothing else other than the importance of the market and marketing applied to everything, and knowing nothing else in their adult lives, THEY ARE NOT LISTENING (possibly with the exception of Siri).
    The risk is that increasing numbers will lose faith in democracy. So be it. They cudda shudda wudda and they had the mandate and reason ? to make meaningful change – they blew it and 4 years in, it’s probably too late.
    Being the imposters they are, maybe they didn’t have reason – more fucking fool them!

    The more they resist meaningful change, the more likely the violent that change will be.
    Thankfully for moi, I have the luxury of retirement, debt free and with an escape hatch – even IF it’s that I have to get death.
    Not so my offspring or those I anticipated and planned to have a better life than me.

  9. Equality is dying in NZ with every 100% woke committee producing time consuming reports while things get worse…. with more money and resources spent on either the same faces with the same things that are not working, or questionable projects run by questionable people.

    Will government listen to what the people are saying about their so called priorities that only the woke committees seem to endorse?

    “More than 15,000 Kiwis have submitted to the Ministry of Justice against the proposed “hate speech” laws and endorsed Free Speech Union’s submission via its submission tool website http://www.FreeSpeechSubmission.com.

    In addition, nearly 40,000 Kiwis signed a seperate “Save Free Speech” petition calling for the Government’s proposals to be dropped, says Jonathan Ayling, Campaign Manager for the Free Speech Union.

    “There is clearly strong opposition to these changes, and the Government needs to throw them out.

  10. I’m definitely on board with this. The Labour Party in NZ is not remotely on the left and their foray into critical social justice will lose more voters quickly. Fighting massive economic disparities should be the focus of the left, not what pronouns we should use so someone doesn’t become offended. This poorly conceived hate speech bill could be a political disaster for Jacinda Ardern.

  11. I remember many years ago an interview on TV (Ian Johnston interviewing Doug Myers) and Doug Myers saying words to the effect – people need to understand that the days of egalitarianism are over. I thought at the time ‘how dare he decide that for us’; but we have sat back and let it happen.
    I think as soon as anyone of us got into power we would quickly learn what forces you are up against. The inability of Labour to get a CGT would be a prime example.
    Growing inequality has been identified in many referendum over many years as a major concern. The question is how to rebalance the playing field without collapsing the economy – evolution is always better than revolution. I think aggressively closing tax loop-holes, closely followed by a CGT, and limiting the profits foreign owned companies can take off-shore would be a good start.

    1. …’Doug Myers saying words to the effect – people need to understand that the days of egalitarianism are over’…

      Yes I seem to recall that,… what an arrogant and totally obnoxious individual. Along with others of the Business Roundtable ( called the NZ Initiative these days), who are actually a regional outpost for the London based Mont Pelerin society. Of which R Douglas and R Richardson were both sitting board members. It was the Mont Pelerin society that advised Thatcher and Reagan.

      Milton Freidman was one of the Mont Pelerin society’s founding members and also its public face, – appearing in a TV series in the 1970’s extolling free market ‘values’.

      These are the sort of ‘Ruthless People’ that Mick Jagger made a song about…

      Mick Jagger – Ruthless People
      https://youtu.be/Rnyp4ahEaws?t=1

  12. Last chance to save egalitarian New Zealand was during Helen Clark’s govt. The housing issue was understood to be worsening then. Plans to build more state housing were quickly dropped during the ‘winter of discontent’ where business leaders raised objections. From then on until today it was business as usual. Any remenants of state services that could have been used to roll back the neo lib experiment were carefully dismantled under Key. Part of the problem seems to be there is no longer any part of the state services that can implement without taking on consultants for the planning and contractors for the doing. This always seems to lead to a budget blowout before anything meaningful can occur (see mental health). The other problem is that Labour are still trying to contrive market solutions to fix the problems created by a market which is working normally. Low income families do not earn enough to afford a house. Why then would the market build them a house? This seems to be the problem Labour cannot get its head around. It also doesnt seem to occur to them that they can change the rules if that is what a solution requires.

Comments are closed.