Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

22 Comments

  1. Nicola Willis op ed defending pay parity ambush was pure embarrassment or to use the old adage, her explaining was losing.

    It is simply a “save the budget” policy, the evidence is the haste in which it was passed with urgency and without the scrutiny of going through select committee.
    Willis had lost control of her finance portfolio.

  2. Good writing. But fine words butter no parsnips. Now, put the argument in simple back-of-the-envelope terms, with simple back-of-the-envelope examples, shrink to fit a 15 or 30-second advert, and go for it. Apparently there’s an election next year. . .

    1. Are our political class dishonest crooks?
      Tired of
      SOEs sold at fire sale rates to mates who then employ the politicians?
      Sick of Regulatory capture by industry, and economic policy written for donors?
      Had a gutsful of deliberate scarcity and public finance lies? Our sovereign economy is nothing like a household budgets – we can choose to invest in ourselves. The question is, why do they suffocate us – the answer is, for privatisation and exploitation.
      Etc

  3. We just need a no confidence party. No confidence in the establishment. If youre in the Bottoms Up, desperate to save our country, freedom, justice and democracy from the Top Downs who own/run everything, vote for a no confidence MP in your electorate. A trusted known local. They dont need to have all the answers. Just hit the breaks and platform the case.

  4. The classic is Luxon is saying this is not a pay cut for women. If this law change is saving money ( as they first trumpeted) what is then?

    As for the abuse Nicola Willis is getting, it’s inexcusable for a number of reasons, one of them being it gives her a distraction to talk about. It makes people forget she is a frequent liar.

  5. “ We do not want to insult Nicola Willis. We want to remove the veil of legitimacy from what she has done. She is – morally, economically – demonic. Without soul, compass, or compassion.”

    According to Andrea Vance she’s a c**t which seems at least slightly insulting

  6. Why did this legislation need to be pushed through under urgency? What is the factor that makes this poorly thought through rubbish something that requires urgent attention? The answer is NOTHING. There was no reason and this is simply another example of this government trampling over democracy to achieve their ends by nefarious means. CoC are nothing but a bunch of jizz swillers.

    1. The claim it’s for budgetary reasons is just cover. Its simply Actlas idealogy implementation.

      The revolutionary urgency is the same playbook that Roger Douglas used to implement at speed his hidden agenda and Trumps dogeing exec orders.

  7. This is what happens when an acolyte from the business round table (oh year, rebranded as the NZ initiative – should be lack thereof) takes control of the government books – unproven neoliberal jabberwocky to the fore (no matter how long the wait for the benefits of this failed ideology).
    When this is combined with ACT and their moronic neolib twats we get the disaster that is currently unfolding in this country. When will people learn – there is NO SUCH THING AS THE TRICKLE DOWN EFFECT!

  8. If you think Nicola Willis is not a c**t have a look at the way she treats Barbara Edmonds at question time in parliament,it’s pure disdain because Willis only knows mean girl attack . So my message to Willis is not if the cap fits but in this case if the condom fits and she who protests too much

  9. The Government is not like a business, the object is public service not profit. With our own fiat currency the nation can afford anything for which there are: workers, tools, time, and land. Do not forget energy is needed, something economists do not understand. Nothing on earth happens without anenergy process.

  10. The problem with personal attacks on an individual politician is that the needed discussion and highlighting of the moral and economic facts can now be ignored by the media and voters. The topic of discussion is now about the personal insult.
    It’s a very weak political strategy and I’m very surprised when experienced political observers – such as Vance – take it anyway. Possibly an indication of the visceral sense of injustice for many who are close to the political metal.

  11. Brilliant article and excellent economic analysis – that included the governments creation of new money for spending through the RBNZ. The wider global context is also important from Brexit to Bolsonaro to Milei, from Willis to Reeves the phrasing and economic context are identical – spanning left and right political parties and developed and developing economies. As though they all have the same script – listing talking points and economic policies.

  12. Keynes said – if we can do it we can afford it. Meaning if there is under utilized economic capacity and potential then the government can create the money needed to put the unused capacity to work.
    Profitability for the private sector requires manufactured scarcity – exactly as the article states. You only need to listen to Scott Bessant complaining that China is making to many cheap products. In other words, abundance and unlimited output is not good for capitalism – when funded through government investment and support.
    Because scarcity is not real (as China demonstrates) it has to manufactured and maintained – the electricity and housing sectors are classic examples in NZ.
    There is no physical, economic, real world reason that these things should be scarce in NZ but they are, and they are both exceptionally profitable assets.

  13. I’ve just re-read this article – it is exceptionally good and we need more like it. Interestingly, the recently recovered Chris Trotter (he’s emerged from a severe infection of ‘anti-woke hysteriaitis’ – most prevalent among males of a certain age and NZF) penned a piece expressing the same points and with the wry observations at which he is so gifted.
    “The fundamental problem with pay equity, however, is the problem very few people are willing to say out loud. Specifically, that paying economically and culturally subordinate classes, genders, and races appreciably less than those above them in the social hierarchy isn’t a bug in our free market system, it’s one of its indispensable features.”
    https://www.interest.co.nz/public-policy/133233/low-pay-isn%E2%80%99t-fixable-bug-our-free-market-system-it%E2%80%99s-one-its-indispensable

  14. Calling the amendment a ‘controlled demolition’ of democracy is strong language, but the context you provide makes it hard to dismiss. We need more scrutiny when ‘fiscal responsibility’ becomes a smokescreen for eroding rights.

  15. Karen Willis has no room to whine about people giving her the disrespect she deserves .Can she not remember when in opposition she spent everyday lying about every minister and policy of the last government .She has never been seen as a nice person and really is a very nasty hateful person of limited talent .

Comments are closed.