Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. This is OUTRAGEOUS!!!

    I hope someone brings this to Brian Edwards’ attention!!! He seems so sympathetic to the plight of the oppressed!

    Lorde – you are a true heroine!!

  2. Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Malala was invited to meet then President Barack Obama, as well as the then UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, and addressed the UN General Assembly. She received numerous accolades from being named one of the 100 Most Influential People by Time magazine and Woman of the Year by Glamour magazine to being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2013, and again in 2014 when she won.

    State representatives such as Hillary Clinton and Julia Gillard as well as prominent journalists such as Nicholas Kristof spoke up in support of her. There is even a Malala Day!

    But we see no #IamAhed or #StandUpForAhed campaigns making headlines. None of the usual feminist and rights groups or political figures has issued statements supporting her or reprimanding the Israeli state. No one has declared an Ahed Day. In fact, the US in the past has even denied her a visa for a speaking tour.

    It seems that we in the West have difficulty standing up to injustice when it’s done by one of our ‘friends’.

    With friends like these, who needs enemies?

    1. “Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?”

      Because the international Israeli government lobby is much more powerful and better connected than the international taliban lobby.

      1. So, what you’re saying is that the reason why Ahed is being ignored is because of the power of the Israeli Lobby?

        How is it that that lobby would have that much power?

        Why do we allow it to have that much power?

        1. Perhaps because the Israel Lobby (check out FB, Twitter, and various right-wing blogs) is so closely allied to the political Right and the religious Right? Plus on top is the narrative ‘sold’ to the public that they’re the “only democracy in the Middle east” (not strictly true), and you have an unhealthy ‘cocktail’ of vested interests, political allegiances, and public naivete.

          Plus the willingness of pro-Israel individuals here in NZ very quick to jump on social media and blog-form to put the Israeli point of view, and label anti-Zionists as “anti-semitic” and “bigots” – and that completes the picture.

          Here’s an example of the Israel lobby at work. This could not have been cheap:

          A full-page advertisement in a major US newspaper has called Lorde a “bigot” for cancelling a planned concert in Israel.

          The ad was paid for by the World Values Network and published in the December 31 issue of The Washington Post.

          “Lorde joined a global anti-Semitic boycott of Israel but will perform in Russia, despite Putin’s support for Assad’s genocide in Syria,” the advert reads.

          ref: http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/entertainment/2018/01/lorde-targeted-in-full-page-ad-after-cancelling-israel-gig.html

          This is how nasty it gets when someone dares say no to Tel Aviv.

          This will not win Israel any friends.

          1. yes, that full page advert is interesting. The thought occurred to me that maybe they are overplaying their hand. But I think it really illustrates their confidence in gaining a sympathetic reception, from the US populace, to their message of condemnation. It might not win Israel any friends internationally, but sadly that might not be the case within the US.

          2. Fair point, Steve. If intended for sole US “consumption”, it may be received differently than if it were published in the Herald or Dompost. I wonder, though, how American performers view the advertisement? If – as you say – they’re “over-playing their hand”, it might give pause-for-thought for those entertainers who might contempt performing in Israel. Who would need the grief it entails?

  3. It pays to remember that the Rothschild family were Jews, and by the end of nineteenth century the Rothschild family had established a global empire rivalling that of any nation. For the most parts the bankers decided who would be provoked or sponsored into wars, and who would win.

    And now most of the western world banks are Rothschild banks.

    Forget about Left Bank and Right Bank. Forget about ‘human rights’: there is only one bank that matters as far as the western world is concerned; and the only rights that now exist are the rights of corporations to write the laws that the bought-and-paid-for (or otherwise controlled) politicians implement.

    This must all end very badly -in fact absolutely catastrophically- for the next generation.

Comments are closed.