Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

19 Comments

    1. Kate Hawkesby is a rich wannabee, and an insufferable troll, that is the mouth-piece of the rich and idle,- a good fit for John Key no doubt, she should be in Hawaii to shouldn’t she?.

          1. My apologies if I offended you Snow White, but the term applies to both sexes and other than people..

            I was remarking on CleanGreen’s description.

            Commonly a person without morals who does whatever suits them for money, favours and power without regards to the effect on others..

            john key is another “outstanding” example as is roger douglas.

            Lets no be too precious. Language changes with use.

            https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-surprising-roots-of-the-word-slut

  1. Yeah ,- WHO is this KATE HAWKESBURY ????

    You haven’t explained that bit yet , Gerard.

    Must be a belated Aprils Fools joke. Never mind, I’m sure you’ll all let us in on the joke sooner or later.

  2. Kate Hawkesby is incensed that Jacinda stole her limelight from her. The only problem with saying that is that Hawkesby has never been in the limelight except the one she created for herself.

    The other big difference between her and Jacinda is that Jacinda displays the true decent self – not the false idol that Hawkesby has created for herself, which she worships every time she looks at herself in the mirror – “mirror, mirror on the wall…..”

  3. I’m staggered that any New Zealand newspaper would publish the utterly vile writings of Kate Hawkesby
    I couldn’t give a damn about the royal family , I’m no monarchist but I do think every human being deserves respect.
    Clearly Kate does give a damn, deeply , bitterly, biliously, so much of her time spent denouncing Meghan Markle in the same style she denounces Jacinda.
    Here she depicts Megan as a lone wolf!
    Unbelievably crass

    “Markle’s a lone wolf ”
    I’m not going to link to the Herald hack piece, but Kate, all that bile may pay the bills but its not good for you
    The Herald’s not looking after the mental health needs of its contributors.

    1. Princess Anne’s OK Fran – but I haven’t really read this article – they need to pixilate (sp?) those staring eyes – I can’t get past them- and the king of Spain is really something, and there’s another king in some continental country I could fancy were he the sort of chappie I fancied – there’s even talk of National’s own Simon Bridges having King Midas’s touch-in-reverse right here in NZ – that’s cos we’re in the Antipodes and everything is upside down.

      Far too many sins of omission from the dreaded Kate H here. Why isn’t she telling people easy ways to clean ovens, or proven pathways to ease life’s woes ? Surely she at last knows the latter.

  4. Those eyes. There is an interstellar-grade vacuum behind those soulless eyes.

    I refuse to click on anything she writes posted on the Heraldwebsite. It is click bait crap.

  5. Perma-tan Kate, Vice President of the “Key Love” club–Hosking is founding member and Life President.

    Highly paid tory mouths for hire, brains and some glimmer of humanity not part of the package!

  6. Hawkesby, Hosking … paid gobshites for Natz! I see their name polluting headlines and skip to something much more enlightening and interesting, such as the cartoons!

  7. I’m looking forward to the inevitable Hawkesky/Hosking divorce. Something tells me it’s gonna be very messy…pass the popcorn! ;o)

  8. A vapid fool of a woman – much like the other right-wing blatherer, Mrs Soper- 2 women who have sold their souls and deserve their awful husbands, the 4 of them in some terrible pact of vicious, destructive jealousy.

Comments are closed.