Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. The coalition could not give a toss, because children don’t vote. Listen to all the idea logical posters on this site. They almost squeal with delight at the prospect of writing off the countryside and they almost froth at the mouth if younger generations complain about fearing for the future. Self centred a’holes to a they/them.

    1. Jacinda left the park with more children in poverty than when she took over .Did she care .

      1. Trevor it’s taken you a matter of months to default to whataboutisms. Jacinda is not the PM. We were told we voted for change. They didn’t stress they meant make things worse.

  2. If Parliamentarians di not get a pay rise then people will not be able to afford to stand and so then we get only the very rich or those that could not earn good money in a normal job.
    While it is sad 147000 children are in poverty many of them are born to parents that are poor so how can that be the governments fault . People need to be educated into understanding the meaning of responsibility to the children they creat

  3. 100% Bryan. What this government is doing is completely shameful. And blatantly corrupt.

    1. Excuse me, but which Party held the majority during the period when the number of children in poverty rose by 23,400?

    2. What Party was occupying the Government benches, with a majority, during the time that this shameful increase occurred?

  4. And some (not all) adult poverty is exacerbated by poor government policy.

  5. 100%. Shameful, amoral, and brutal, with Key’s protégée Bennett now resurrected by slippery David Seymour.

Comments are closed.