Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. I think we should absolutely scrap these sorts of things. Many of the people in our society who have worked at the grass roots level would never ever be offered a gong! Those who led the anti apartheid, those who led the NZ Nuclear free movement, the peace movement, the GE free movement. And the many who are leading things for real change right now to help us return to that egalitarian society including the union movment. NO DAM POLITICIANS SHOULD GET GONGS THEY ARE THE ONES WHO COULD HAVE MADE REAL CHANGE BUT DON’T TOO busy hanging on to their salaries to be bold and forward thinking. Let’s give a gong if we must to the likes of Mike Joy and Russel Norman, really putting themselves on the line.

  2. “A few days ago I was talking with Liz Gunn on her Drive show on Radio Live when I found myself remembering out loud that one of the things that once marked our National character is that we were an egalitarian country – that we believed “Jack was as good as his master” and that we called no man “Sir”

    “It’s a charactistic, I regret to say, that is in grave risk of disappearing from the New Zealand psyche”

    And you are right on both counts

  3. Value decouples from Worth when Wealth disconnects from Morals, and Honors ring hollow when they do nothing about it.

    For example, Banks advising Landlords to Ghost House to force other buyers to take on more debt, whilst the architected loopholes make the loss deductible. That situation inflates the book value of the properties by inflicting artificial scarcity on the housing market.

    But the actual net situation produced has negative real worth. Ghost houses are useless. Ulterior calculations have contaminated the dynamics.

    Now we have these chronically ulterior market dynamics across the entire market and we call it the property ladder, the stepping on people’s faces. Where’s the honor? I suggest there isn’t much and it behooves the honorable to reject honors emerging from the context of such a system.

    One shouldn’t want to be a prosthetic face for something ugly

  4. ?But have THEY really worked hard?

    No they haven’t. As I learned in AMWAY you don’t get rich by working.

    The next question is Do they deserve to be rich?

    The answer is also no.

    Extreme Wealth is Not Merited

    Extreme wealth evokes images of both deserving entrepreneurs and fat cats. This paper explores whether the meritocracy argument stands up as a defence of extreme wealth. It uses an analytical framework – ‘the ladder of demerit’ – to look at several sources of extreme wealth ranging from crime and cronyism, to inheritance, monopoly, globalization and technology. The higher rungs are clearly not meritocratic. The lower ones reward talented people multiple times what can be justified based on merit.

    Data drawn largely from Forbes’ list of billionaires provides a tentative indication of the relative importance of each rung.

    The paper concludes that fifty percent of the world’s billionaire wealth is non-meritocratic owing to either inheritance or a high presumption of cronyism. Another 15 percent is not meritocratic owing to presumption of monopoly. All of it is non-meritocratic owing to globalization. By contrast, crime and technology are found to be negligible sources of extreme wealth.

  5. Key reintroduced knight & dame hoods for 2 reasons:

    1) To give himself a knighthood when he left politics

    2) To sell these honours to wealthy (undeserving) people, to raise funds for National’s election campaigns

Comments are closed.