Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

105 Comments

  1. “Russia does not have a free press providing balanced reports of the situation. Most people in Russia including many of those in the ‘elite’ will see only what Putin wants them to see.” BEN MORGAN

    If he had not been uncovered and was still in the position to alter the RNZ overseas news feed, the Kremlin’s asset at RNZ, would have altered this story to benefit Putin. To try to make us see what Putin wants us to see.

    1. So now we see only what Reuters want us to see? History is littered with examples where disputes over what is true have divided people & at times it is possible that both sides can be wrong.

    2. “The Kremlin’s asset” – sitting behind you keyboard, that’s a pretty gutless accusation to make against someone who has lost his job for simply subbing foreign news agency stories to alter their bias, Pat.

      1. ‘Simply subbing foreign new agency stories to alter their bias’ (Malcolm Evans). It’s pretty obvious to me Malcolm that you wouldn’t know objectivity unless you fell over it. There are many value judgments of yours in that small phrase I quoted.
        The subbing was greatly offensive to Ukrainians in New Zealand and the culprit should apologise to them.

        1. umm, Sorry Ovod, but I find you unconvincing. I suspect that you meant to write: “IF you fell over it.” “Unless” makes little sense.
          Your subsequent attempt at objectivity fails when you use the word ‘culprit’. I have seen many who defend this “culprit’s” additions as adding objectivity, not lessening it.
          Freedom of speech?

          1. Adding objectivity? You have to be joking! Reuters and the BBC are outraged that this happened. ‘I have seen many’ that is a convenient generality on your part. I can wager that many more people saw this ‘editing’ as an outrage.

      2. “… a pretty gutless accusation to make against someone who has lost his job.” MALCOLM EVANS

        He didn’t lose his job he resigned.

        https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300911273/rnz-staffer-accused-of-prorussian-edits-to-ukraine-war-news-resigns#

        If anyone is gutless, it is someone working behind the scene putting words in others’ mouths that they never said. If he had any courage he would have stood his ground and argued his case and fought for his job.

        He wasn’t sacked. He quit while he was on paid leave, (pending an investigation). He could have put his case. This is not Russia, he would have got a fair hearing. And the public would have got a chance to hear his defence for his actions, and the reasons behind them, as he saw it. But no, instead he slunk off like someone with something to hide.

        He will get another job. The worst thing that could happen to him, is that he might struggle to find another job.

        He won’t lose 25 years of his life.

        https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63597097

        “….The activist was first accused of “spreading false information” about Russia’s military and “higher leadership”.
        The rights group OVD-Info has recorded more than 100 prosecutions under that so-called “fake news” law since the war began: a local councillor, Alexei Gorinov, was sentenced to seven years in July and activist Ilya Yashin will go on trial soon after referring to the murder of civilians in Bucha.
        Vladimir’s case is based on a speech in Arizona where he said Russia was committing war crimes in Ukraine with cluster bombs in residential areas and “the bombing of maternity hospitals and schools”.
        That has all been independently documented, but according to the charge sheet I have seen, Russian investigators deem his statements to be false because the defence ministry “does not permit the use of banned means… of conducting war” and insists that Ukraine’s civilian population “is not a target”.
        The facts on the ground are ignored….

        https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/declaration-on-imprisoned-russian-opposition-activist-vladimir-kara-murza

        Mr Kara-Murza, a journalist and politician, was recently sentenced to 25 years in prison on charges linked to his criticism of the war of aggression against Ukraine. The charges against Mr Kara-Murza are unfounded, and together with a sham trial, constitute a clear violation of his human rights…..
        ….His bravery in speaking out against the current government of the Russian Federation and the Russian aggression against Ukraine in a country where opposition is silenced by death, imprisonment or exile, commands our respect.

    3. lol cry more American lover. How does the blood of a million Iraqi children taste?

        1. Wow. If I was Ben Morgan and Martyn I’d be so proud to have chauvinist, racist bigots like this one, Ted and Ovod on my side. What a crew.

          1. You are the racist Paul – with your hate of Ukrainians.
            I have Russian blood so I can’t hate Russians by definition. Just Putin.
            Keep trolling Paul.

      1. Wouldn’t know. Is it different on the palate than the blood of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians? Less cumin perhaps?

  2. Does anybody really think that the Russians are going to give up and go home if Putin were to be replaced? Would Medvedev show restraint? Nothing changes for the advantage of the West.

    I haven’t followed the affair, kept my eyes on the front. Russian forces are busy absorbing and annihilating the UA. There is no opportunity for Ukraine’s offensive, merely defeat. The question now is how Russian forces take advantage?

    1. Only insane people believe this (i.e. all American-lovers). Most Russians think Putin hasn’t been nearly harsh enough against the enemies of humanity, and that the liberation of Donetsk and Luhansk should have happened years ago.

        1. “No troll food available” N.J.

          You should lay a complaint with your handlers.

  3. Putin is now weakened because this went public. This also happened to Gorbachev – a failed coup attempt followed a few weeks later by his ousting.

    Also, Prigozhin needs to keep the curtains drawn and pour his own drinks for the rest of his life…

    1. In 1991, Yeltsin took advantage of the chaos from that coup to cement his power over what was then the RFSR while the USSR was falling down around everyone’s ears. People forget after the coup, he banned the CPSU on Russian soil. There is no Yeltisin like figure today.

    2. Was never a serious coup attempt.He had no one serious on his side to start with

  4. My theory is that the CIA/NATO offered the Wagner mercenary group more than what Putin was paying them to fight in Ukraine and instead fight Russia (that is after all the nature of a private army). Then Putin countered that offer within 24 hours and sent them to Belarus. I suspect $10’s of millions were in play (if not more).
    The more “out there” explanation is it was all a 4D chess move by Putin where the entire thing was staged to further consolidate his power and confuse CIA/NATO giving them false hope and root out those close to him who supported the fake coup. I think Erdogan made a similar thing where a possible fake coup occurred while he wasn’t even there which he immediately used to create new totalitarian laws that helped cement his leadership.

    1. @Nitrium. Exactly. Both theories make sense. I’m inclined towards the second because: how was the mercenary army able to advance so easily on Russian territory, like it was an abandoned ship??? Unless it was just pre-agreed theater. Or maybe Putin was trying to avoid bloodshed or things getting worse.

    2. This is a crazy conspiracy theory. Totally false. The events were bizarre enough without inventing some crazy conspiracy theory.

  5. Russia has been in the crap since Gorbachev/Yeltsin/Putin when the workers assets and industry were handed over to Oligarchs and millions of hard done by people in the ex USSR states saw their pensions and savings disappear. Longevity dropped rapidly. Cur Roger Douglas even did a series of lectures explaining to the poor Russians how best to quickly flog off state assets along with other IMF World Bank types.

    The ex USSR had become what the trotskyites call a “degenerate workers state”, every thing socially owned, but with a bureaucratic layer in charge rather than the mass of the people–but they had free education, health etc. If the soviets had gone consumerist and invented skinny jeans and iPhones instead of SS20s they might still be here!

    But–Remember Jan 6 at Congress–the USA came seriously close to their own coup a couple of years back–seriously. So don’t be too smug–the governed either participate or they are ruled by authoritarians as in many countries now.

    1. ” If the soviets had gone consumerist and invented skinny jeans and iPhones instead of SS20s they might still be here!”

      That is what the Chinese did.

  6. Anybody who bothered to read news or listen to anyone in eastern Europe knew ages ago that the entire so called Russian military was privatized, bought and paid for mercenaries. Most of us who are anti war knew how fucking scary this is. Yes this is Russian vaudeville.

    1. @tabatha. Yes, Russia is paying Wagner troops, likely instructing their military commander (not Rogojin, he’s just the PR face) how to proceed, yet they decide to bomb them out as Rogojin claimed? Just defies common sense.

      1. I believe that Prigozhin is paying for his Wagner troops not the Kremlin. Wagner pays well above Russian army rates tax free and Prigozhin has the money, particularly from the gold mines in Africa that he occupies. When Prigozhin’s HQ was raided the FSB found a billion roubles that were used to pay the mercenaries.

    2. Tabatha – bullshit! Try to not overstate your erroneous conjectures. eg
      ” ..the entire so called Russian military was privatized, bought and paid for mercenaries..”

  7. What march to Moscow? 3k Wagner troops taking a meandering stroll in the Russian country side.

  8. Ben, I cannot agree that this incident turns Putin into a stronger leader. Quite the reverse in fact and all the pundits say so. They all say Putin looks weaker. Also witness the adoration that Prigozhin got in Rostov which is difficult to comprehend. Perhaps they were happy he was leaving.
    By the way, it is ‘siloviki’ [силовики] not the way you spelled it (silovaki).

    1. I also think Putin has been weakened. Prigozhin is the one who has earned an immunity, not Putin.
      Putin is the current figure head prosecuting the war on behalf of the Kleptocratic imperialist Russian state. The war is not going well. It will be Putin who will take the fall for its failure. Rather than being another Peter The Great, ruler of a reborn Russian empire as he imagined, I have little doubt Putin’s descent to ignominy will happen relatively soon. The oligarchs will switch their support to Prigozhin. Prigozhin is telling it like it is. “The war is unwinnable” “Putin’s reasons for it are false”

      “…the adoration that Prigozhin got in Rostov which is difficult to comprehend.”

      Not too difficult to comprehend, Prigozhin is currently the most googled subject line in Russia.
      Despite the fact that he is one himself, Prigozhin’s attacks on the oligarchs has struck a chord. Much like Trump’s attacks on the ‘Elites’ and Hitlers attacks on the financiers and bankers struck a chord with people, despite the fact the Trump himself was a billionaire and Hitler was funded by the financiers and bankers.

  9. tl;dr yet

    a lovers tiff and a good excuse to calm the farm. pure theatrics to cover their atrocity. a new opera for the bolshoi to dance to. the oligarchs are revolting. who is in the wings, waiting? gangsters with nukes. what can go wrong. my bet is on a major general -lol-

    1. Dr doom, although some operas have ballets, generally speaking it is ballets that are danced to and operas that are sung!

          1. Nutcracker and Swan Lake are good choices! But Спашная Красавитсьа (Sleeping Beauty) is the best!

  10. I’m curious how Pat and Ovod try to reconcile the fact they label Putin a brutal Dictator but somehow he somehow let Prigohzin walk away. It must be a real mind fcuk for them both.

    1. Not at all FG. Putin has reneged, as I knew he would, and is going after Prigozhin big time!

  11. OP: “Russia is not Europe”.

    I respectfully disagree.

    There are two European halves that are equally ‘European’: one organized around the Protestant-Catholic and the other organized around the Orthodox-Eastern/Greek axis.
    It’s the Tsarist-autocratic-colonial mindset of their leaders that has always been a problem.

    1. Agreed Alyana! Although Ukraine is wholly in Europe, Russia is not and the idea of Eurasianism has been promoted by Dugin, Ilyine and other ultranationalist philosophers.

  12. Now the excitement is all over, Putin is still in charge, Ukraine’s offensive is still going nowhere and is taking enormous losses. Carry on trolls.

  13. All the experts have been focused on the US elections in November 2024 but forget that Russia has presidential elections around April 2024. I have heard that Putin may be forced to withdraw from standing in these elections. This is far from certain however.

  14. Russians are soft cocks – what sort of tossers put up with a dicktraitor for so long – Ukraine and NATO will tear them a new one

    1. And glasnost. And there hasn’t been any glasnost in Russia since Putin took power!

  15. “In the West, used to stable government this event is very dramatic. However, I think that in Russia it will have less of an impact; and in fact, may contribute to Putin’s reputation as a strong leader.” BEN MORGAN

    Far from being seen as a strong leader, Putin is being mocked for his weak response to the insurrection by pro-war Russians.

    https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/hardline-russians-mock-pitiful-putin-133325920.html

    Hardline Russians Mock ‘Pitiful’ Putin’s Bewildering Post-Mutiny Speeches
    Allison Quinn
    Wed, 28 June 2023 2-min read

    Exerpt:

    ….”I have not seen anything more pitiful performed by a man remotely resembling the president. Great job everyone… The unrest continues,” wrote Igor Strelkov, the former commander of Russia’s proxy forces in Donetsk.

    Other pro-Kremlin military bloggers insisted the Kremlin would soon show a more decisive response to the uprising.

    “I just can’t believe that this is it,” wrote pro-Russian military blogger Yury Kotenok, speculating that perhaps “personnel decisions” will soon be announced as a result of the mutiny.

    “There is a stubborn belief that this is not all. We’re waiting,” wrote Semyon Pegov.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, meanwhile, dismissed claims that the armed uprising over the weekend had been a blow to Putin’s image, saying that it was just “ultra-emotional tantrums” by analysts that were to blame for that notion….

    “Now that the crisis has been quickly averted it will be portrayed as an example of Putin’s strength and decisive leadership.” BEN MORGAN

    The portrayal being put on these events by the Kremlin, as an example of Putin’s strength and decisive is being echoed by pro-war trolls here. Meanwhile inside Russia itself pro-war bloggers are mocking the Kremlin’s response. Others will judge what this says about the pro-war-trolls here and the useful idiots that follow them. I think that basically they are unthinking stooges for whatever troll food the Kremlin feeds them.

    1. God you’re a laugh Pat
      Which is it?
      Putins a monster who kills everyone who disagrees with him
      He’s an all powerful dictator,bloodthirsty and cruel,a maniac
      And when it becomes evident he’s none of those things .you Nato freaks cry ” he’s weak.he’s weak “!
      And now you’re taking the word of Strelkov!!!!
      Jeez .watch out for the whiplash

      1. Stop being so simplistic Francesca.
        Putin has promoted the strongman image since he came to power. Now that image has been dented. Putin promoted his lackeys so they would fight with each other hence Prigozhin v. Shoigu. But Prigozhin overstepped the mark by going after Shoigu, this threatened Putin who fled for the hills. Putin is a coward but a repressive coward.

  16. It was a hikoi. A labour contract dispute with tanks.
    Putin got lemons, made lemonade.

    1. Nuclear laced lemonade

      Putin has sent nuclear weapons to Belarus.

      Putin has sent Prigozhin and his mercenary army to Belarus.

      Sounds like a recipe for disaster if you asked me.

      https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/492764/mercenary-chief-prigozhin-starts-exile-in-belarus-putin-praises-russian-troops

      Lukashenko said on Tuesday that his country offered Wagner fighters an abandoned military base. “Please – we have a fence, we have everything – put up your tents,” Lukashenko said, according to BELTA.
      The prospect of Wagner establishing a base in Belarus was greeted with alarm by some of its neighbours. Latvia and Lithuania called for NATO to strengthen its eastern borders in response, and Polish President Andrzej Duda described the move a “negative signal”.

      A “negative signal” would be putting it mildly

      Prigozhin’s battle hardened mercenary fighters took over two Russian cities and the military command centre of the Russian army based in Rostov-On-Don. As well as this Wagner’s battle hardened fighters got within spitting distance of the Kremlin, shooting down several Russian war planes that tried to oppose their advance. Prigozhin wasn’t turned back by the Russian army, he voluntarily withdrew his mercenary fighters, to “prevent further bloodshed”.

      In light how easily Wagner fighters took over two Russian cities. and the military command centre for the Russian army in Rostov-on-Don.
      For Wagner’s battle hardened fighters to take control of the nuclear weapons stationed in Belarus would be a walk in the park.

      https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/17/putin-confirms-nuclear-weapons-have-been-deployed-to-belarus/?

      Putin confirmed that Russia has deployed its first tranche of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, a plan that was announced earlier, but he gave an ambiguous assessment of Russia’s willingness to use them.
      “Nuclear weapons are created to ensure our security in the broadest sense of the word and the existence of the Russian state. But we, firstly, do not have such a need,” Putin said.

      Putin may not have such a need but Prigozhin does. (Even if it is just to save his own neck).

      Armed with nuclear weapons Prigozhin could dictate his own terms to Putin, to Lukashenko, to Zelensky, to anyone, or else.

      If Prigozhin leveled Kiev with a tactical nuclear weapon, it is possible that he would be greeted as a hero in Russia.

      If Prigozhin’s mercenary forces can capture the tactical nukes stationed in Belarus, it is possible that Prigozhin could become the most successful warlord on the Russian Steppes since Genghis Khan.

      1. You are hysterical. I know Ben is leading the way here, but tacking your feverish takes on to random comments does not make then rational. It does not matter how many articles you link, Pat, you have demonstrated you lack sufficiently broad and critical awareness to interpret events with any accuracy.

        Where you are right is that we are at a nuclear precipice. The Western media continues – somehow, despite the vows of various american psychos – to deny that this is the result of a long planned provocation that threatens the existence of Russia. Russia openly states that, but gatekeepers like Ben dismiss it and do not report its truth. And regardless, the fact that Russia believes it is not a game. It’s a situation couples get into where one does not believe their words/actions are causing any harm and the other has to do something drastic, scream or smash or punch, to be heard.

        The invasion is the first smash of a vase. They won a month in, but then Nato stepped in. As Nato gives longer reach missiles to Ukraine, the more land Russia must take to unilaterally protect its security. When the provision necessitates a strike outside Ukraine, at the moment is only a matter of time. It remains to be seen if the next “scream” to listen from Russia will be inside Ukraine or not, nuclear or not.

        1. I have to agree with him there Pat, you do appear to choose quotes and dubious sources to promote your biased worldview. Anti imperialism is good, however i do have an issue with your failure to recognize the obvious fact the arguably largest imperialist empire in history is directly responsible for the current conflict and continues to inflame the situation. Peace could have been achieved within the first month except the West promoted war yet again, when do we finally hold them accountable?
          Russia understand the true nature of the demonic west and is now acting accordingly.

    2. Really in essence all it was is an employee dispute. Wagner paid by Russia threw their toys out of the cot because they had to sign a contract with the MOD, hardly surprising since it is against the Russians constitution to have a PMC fighting on Russian soil. The Donbas is legally part of Russia now.

      1. Fingrinn the territorial claim you made re the Donbass is unrecognised by the vast majority of the world. Nato, China and all that really matter say the illegally occupied Ukranian territory still legally belongs to Ukraine. Russia has failed to occupy all the land they claim and is retreating slowly every day. It is just a matter of time until Russia is thrown out of Ukraine or sees the light and withdraws of their own accord. Putin made a serious miscalculation and never expected the level of resistance that occurred and is continuing to build. F16’s and ATACAM’s are on the way. How will Russia respond?

      2. Don’t trivialise the issue FG. Prigozhin planned to arrest Shoigu and Gerasimov. What he intended to do with them is not hard to guess. The rumour was that a Shoigu PMC was moving in on Prigozhin’s turf in Africa.
        The support that Prigozhin got in Rostov would indicate that a full scale insurrection could have happened.
        Putin is weakened and as he is due for re-election next March, what price an anti-war candidate stands? Or will Putin declare martial law and postpone the elections?

  17. Nearly 4 weeks of offensive so far. Progress zilch, haven’t even breached Russian first lines of defense, stuck in grey zone. As suspected.

    1. This is Biden’s fault for not providing F16s and ATACAMs earlier. Lack of air superiority is a problem and this will not be addressed until the end of the year. On the other hand the lack of Wagner PMC fighters will hurt Putin.

      1. Now it’s all somebodies fault. That implies I called it correctly. All pretty obvious.

Comments are closed.