MEDIA WATCH: Gillette – the best a progressive can get?

ByMartyn Bradbury

In the eruption of anger over the Gillette advert, there seems to be a lot getting missed.

Of course the message that men need to think about their behaviour towards women and to challenge each other when they see harassment is valid, timely and needs amplification.

But there are also real question marks over corporations being the bearers of these messages.

The irony of a corporation that has used hyper-masculine imagery for 3 decades to sell their product now criticising men for buying into that hyper-masculinity seems a tad on the nose.

I was personally pretty cynical towards the Gillette advert and wrote it off as corporate woke wash, but watching in disbelief at Roastbusters wanting to launch a music career this week forces me to put that cynicism aside and acknowledge the deep need for the message Gillette is pushing.

BUT.

I just don’t know if corporations can actually be part of any real solution the way I don’t think Macdonalds can be relied on for dietary advice.

The 2016 Amnesty International report into the use of Palm oil in products for Gillette’s parent company, Proctor & Gamble, from Indonesian production plants is incredibly damning in terms of environmental damage, worker abuse and ironically discrimination against women…

…so while I applaud the message and think many mens anger at being reminded of our basic obligations of decency is insecurity and perception of a loss of identity, I still have great difficulty seeing corporations as part of the deeper solutions we require beyond the immediacy of this moment.

 

 

Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. Gilette imo managed to simultaneously insult men and women with that ad. Men in that the very act of being masculine (i.e. a man) is somehow “toxic”, and women in that being non-masculine are somehow too weak to protect themselves (so much for the much vaunted equality message). Hilariously the top rated comment on the Gilette video was someone who said something like “my wife’s boyfriend really liked your ad”, which Gilette pinned and replied to with “so glad he enjoyed the video” (unfortunately now deleted).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQYoPBSEY9Y
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_TQl9IwRrU

    1. No thanks. The link titles (“anti masculine propaganda”) was enough to put me off. Fuck it, Iain, if some blokes are so fucking insecure they can’t take a bit of criticism and home truths, from an advert for chrissakes, then those snowflakes have way bigger problems.

      Jesus, are we men so bloody fragile that criticism of bad behaviour is taken as an attack on our masculinity? I don’t think so.

      Shout yourself a fucking latte and chill, Iain.

      1. We let transnationals have Santa and the Easter bunny. I’d suggest not letting them have young adolescents males as well. Just a suggestion.

    1. Dunno why men get so defensive. If you behave decently and don’t punch women for not cooking your fucking eggs, then you got nothing to be wound up about. My self worth and identity as a bloke is not so fragile that criticism of bad male behaviour turns me into a snowflake in need of emotional support.

      If guys can’t take criticism, they need to ask themselves WHY that is. If a simple advert is enough to send them into flurries of anxiety and insecurity, that’s a fairly damning indictment of their characters.

      Time for a beer. And a game of rugby and a bet on the TAB. Maybe a cappuchino afterwards.

  4. I am so tired of ‘woke’ jargon. Please write,as you are well able, in clear, literate English and dispense with these stupid cliches. It’s doing my head in.

Comments are closed.