Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

28 Comments

  1. Only a few random reports with any semblance of fair reporting on the Al Aqsa Mosque snuck through on RNZ–one an Aussie reporter on the 5am First Start. RNZ sounded relieved though when reports claimed a few puny “missiles” had been launched by Palestinians so they could put the boot in as per usual.

    Generally the coverage refers to “conflict between Palestinians and IDF and cops”. What a joke, kneeling or sitting unarmed worshipers beaten with batons and subjected to stun grenades! More like a planned racist attack by the new extreme right Israeli Govt.

  2. Thank you John. The omissions are so evident to anyone comparing news that RNZ offers. Had the BBC interview with Hanan Ashwari been viewed here then at least viewers could evaluate for themselves the veracity of her comments. We are denied the realities of Palestinian subjugation by Israeli laws and forces articulated by this highly intelligent and eloquent spokesperson. Instead, we are subjected to the ubiquitous spin provided by the pro-Israel interests. No wonder trust in RNZ is decreasing daily as more realistic reporting providing important contexts is available elsewhere.

  3. In order to make sense of the tragic events in Palestine we deserve honest media presentations of the real situation, starting with the basic understanding and context that Israel is a colonial-settler regime exercising Apartheid-style control of historic Palestine enforced by brutal military occupation. The BBC consistently fails to deliver this reality.

  4. The first step to really understanding world affairs is to realize that journalism – of the mainstream kind – spearheaded by the likes of the BBC and the countless news sites that host their views, cannot be trusted to give accurate, unbiased information on any event, let alone that of the Middle East variety.

    Mainstream media today is thee most dangerous entity facing humanity today!

  5. How were Jewish synagogues treated in the Arab world? Razed to the ground without exception and all the property of Jewish citizens confiscated. Around 900,000 Jews were expelled from Muslim states from 1948 to the early 70’s.

    1. How does this address the issue of the BBC refusing to put the Illegal Israeli Occupation of Palestine in context?

      Is it just a Look Over There position to divert attention to the issue raised? Which is what I see all the time from Pro Israel Apartheid supporters.

  6. Thanks John for your clear points on media bias. Context and history is everything. Using the terms Apartheid, Occupation and Settler colonial state are essential in describing the appalling conditions Palestinians live under everyday. “The BBC’s coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “incomplete” and “misleading”, including failing to adequately report the hardships of Palestinians living under occupation, an independent review commissioned by the corporation’s board of governors has found” https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/may/03/israel.broadcasting

  7. RNZ and TVNZ put themselves forward as professional news platforms. But Refuse to allow their own Journalists to correct the biased reporting of the BBC. Acknowledging the Illegal Israeli Occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territories is fundamental to the context of these news stories. If I worked for RNZ or TVNZ in their newsrooms, I would be Embarrassed by what the Editors in charge allow through pretending it is Balanced reporting. They should speak up to their management. Or get used to being though as Shills in defense of Israeli Occupation znd Apartheid.

  8. “The first step, for the benefit of journalism and the understanding of New Zealanders is for RNZ and TVNZ is to refuse to republish any future BBC reports on the Middle East.”
    Better they don’t simply rely on the BBC as the ‘goto’ sauce, and offer alternative sources and some critical analysis alongside.
    I realise the critical analysis might be a tough ask with many of the autocue readers and cadet journalists at the helm, but they could at least make an effort.
    Also, the BBC is currently being ripped apart with some of the best of its journalists getting the push in favour of a few media stars, and in the name of austerity. Just as the Tories like, and they haven’t finished yet. We need more voices, not fewer.

  9. They were super fast to pull RT (Russia Today) off Sky as soon as the Ukraine war started (presumably to ensure we are fed a one-side story… if “Russian Propaganda” on RT was obvious, it would surely do no harm to hear and subsequently criticise it). The double standard is noteworthy.

    1. Seriously fuck them. Why on earth anyone would pay a sky news subscription so they can brainwash them is beyond comprehension.

      1. The older I get, the more obvious it is becoming that the MSM (and by extension the agencies regulating it) are all part of a massive psy-op and/or social engineering experiment.

  10. My pattern-recognition faculties indicate that the Jews love to push multi-culturalism, minority rights and globalism (i.e. anti-nationalism) everywhere they in the world, except of course when these principles concern Israel. They give themselves a pass from their own rules.

    1. Meh, Jews in Israel are nationalistic. Jews in the wider world not so much. Kiwis in Enzed are nationalistic, those abroad, not so much.

  11. Excellent article, John. And some very good points in the comments. But where’s Gaby..
    The role the broadcasters play in forming our views is clearly something that’s been worked out for a while and “appropriate” techniques put into practice. My favourite metaphor for (evil) propaganda is – it’s like rat bait. 95% healthy, 5% toxin. Unfortunately my preferred station, National Radio, too frequently has profane invective directed at as I respond to lies they pass on. In the spirit of bilingual RNZ, “pokokohua!” to those bullshitters. They need to stop licking the BBC’s arse.

Comments are closed.