Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. There was an excellent discussion on this on RNZ yesterday on their Outspoken slot just after the 5.00pm news. Well worth listening to

  2. Yep that sums things up as a generation X very well… Generation Y are still accepting the system. But as it states that will change in time…

  3. As a prime example of GenX, and a life time renter the thing I can’t get my head around is how and where will I live in my old age??
    I guess the idea is that my savings will keep the landlords happy, but then my husband and I are using those, and a percentage of our wages, to help support our 3 millennials who are being hit with massive living/education costs.
    And the odds are that ‘the kids’ will not make it onto the housing ladder either.
    So my question to whomever is hoping to get my family’s vote…where is the sustainable housing plan for future pensioners ‘surviving’ on the pension and who only enough savings to buy some false teeth and a mobility scooter??
    I wait with bated breath.

  4. As genx I am really pissed off we here from the Bady doomers how there entitled as they paid there tax well we are paying bloody taxes as well and are being given the two fingers phill goff campaigned in 2011 asking the Bady boomers to help recapitalise superannuation they told us to piss off well if we are not going get the same deal why should we pay there bloody super now .and as for the natz they should be hung we wouldnt be in this mess if those greedy wankers hadn’t destroyed every savings fund kirk scheme 1976 ,winstone peters 1997 referendum the Cullen fund moving the goal posts on kiwi saver those fuckers are to blame our rage should be squarely aimed I at the natz I for one will not accept being screwed over and it’s long over due the natz get it in the neck,

  5. And you will notice, that the only party with guts to raise the Superannuation Age, is ACT. Our website says it all:

    “ACT believes that retirement is a predictable expense for which the vast majority of citizens are able to save independently, given clear signals about what the government will and will not be providing. Under the Status quo, superannuation is an enormous fiscal cost that is subject to political manipulation.

    In the short term, the government should abandon the unproductive policies of saving (the so-called ‘Cullen fund’) and subsidising Kiwisaver while in the government itself is in debt and running deficits. In the medium term it should reduce the fiscal costs of superannuation by raising the age of entitlement to reflect increases in life expectancy and then index it to reflect further increases. Over the long term, the government should send clear signals to younger New Zealanders that superannuation in the future will be a safety net for those genuinely unable to provide for themselves.

    A vote for ACT will help pay off debt and make working kiwis responsible for their own superannuation lifestyle needs.

    1. on the crap wages high cost of living fat chance act party must be on LSD planet coo coo land

  6. OK then, bring it on. Bring on raising Super Age as an election platform for 2017 election

    Let National, ACT, United Future, TMP and TOP fight the next election on raising the superannuation age.

    Bring it on, but I m sure that Crosby, Textor and Farrar will be as pleased with that prospect, as they would seeing a turd in their corporate punchbowl.

    Bring it on Bill, David, Peter, Marama, and Gareth. Raise the Superannuation Age to 70+.

    But, you’d be better to make Super’s eligibility only for residents of 25 years or more, otherwise immigrants should apply to their country of origin for their Superannuation. That should stave off having to alienate boomer voters and millenials.

    So, Hobson’s Choice really. Alienate the boomer voters and millenial voters, or alienate immigrants. Tough choice – eh Winston?

    1. the elephant in the room is the housing bubble popping and prospect of thousands families going underwater/bankrupt

  7. its not realistic to expect gen x to have anywhere near the required savings rents and housing costs are killing any savings margins that exist
    and those who have bought a home are sitting on a debt bomb waiting to go off when the bubble pops you have to be freehold by your early forties to have enough time to save.

    the nats are to blame thats who we need to hang,
    i still think these fund manager will find away to loot kiwi saver
    this PBS documentary is worth watching the retirement gamble
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0ZAy03ubSw

  8. Interesting commentary, and some good points. My 2 bits worth: (1) all student debt should be forgiven forthwith (I speak as one of the generation that actually had allowances to attend university); (2) clamp down severely on immigration, only admit those who really would add to us (we have, e.g., far too many chefs and taxi drivers from elsewhere, adding to the burden).

    1. What’s worse Tom, is that an immigrant only has to be here 10 years to be eligible for full Superannuation at 65. How is that fair?

      Most Kiwis have worked for 40 + years with the expectation of having a universal Superannuation at 65. If Super is too expensive, surely that immigrant loophole should be closed first and sooner than later.

  9. Divide and rule – while gen x and the millennials are blaming labour-voting boomers for their suffering you fail to address the real issues.

Comments are closed.