Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. Apart from the fact that we rarely get a say in what the State does, most people don’t give a fig leaf what someone or some body does, in the interests of the State, unless the State’s mainstream media apparatus makes a song and dance about it. and that only happens when the State wishes to advance or stop an initiative they are interested in. The supermarkets have been chosen as thee ideal route for the State to advance their powers of control over us all. Our ability to speak out is weakening while State power is growing. Meanwhile, war is raging, economies are under threat and climate change along with the next health scare means hard decisions will need to be made…but the State is setting up the frame work that affords them the ability to make these hard decisions, at little consequence to itself! Oh the joy of what ignorance allows power to do!

  2. Imagine Ms Solomon’s possible response in the US, with the court case and jury-awarded damages or an out-of-court settlement. Follow the money – money works

  3. The privacy commission needs to step in and forbid this immediately. It should never have been permitted to go on trial. What the hell is wrong with people. This is a step beyond CCTV and that’s bad enough. Just extroplate how this can be misused with say a dictator like Assad in place.

    1. Good voice of the crowd LC. You are about a year late mate. If you have been to a supermarket in the last 13 months you are likely on file.

      1. I said the same at the time. Once the trial is over, the privacy commission should not allow it to progress. They shouldn’t have allowed the trial. Why don’t people card about protecting their privacy anymore? Social media has made idiots of anyone who uses it.

  4. I don’t shop at places with facial recognition why should I give spys my money. And people should wear a mask, our privacy is being eroded.

Comments are closed.