Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

28 Comments

  1. It’s a national disgrace that the school lunch programmers is needed at all.

    1. just like in the rest of the world… so a global disgrace according to one rightard.

      1. David Seymour and Chris Luxon, you mean
        “National disgrace” of course.

  2. Luxon should grow some balls and tell David this stops right facken now .You are wasting more money than Jacinda could have dreamed of wasting .The lunch program goes back to how it was and the treaty bill is stopped right now today .David your voter support only just passes the number of unemployed so you are in fact down with the bottom feeder lot when it comes to who you really are .
    David did you not read Sir Ian Taylors open letter on stuff yesterday where he summed you up as the arsehole you really are ?
    Now theres a good boy run along and play in your sand pit I will send Jones to play on the toy digger ..

  3. It was actually quite clever of Luxon to make Seymour the Minister of School Lunches. Luxon recently stated that there might be some teething issues but it was up to David to sort them out. Unable to resist another title to his name, our soon to be deputy PM, now has to fix a programme he is politically opposed to. Or does he

    1. Yes, Peter and it was a cunning move from Nicola no boats to pass the buck to Winstone to fix her fucked up ferry debacle. Clever is not a word I would use for any of the national leaders, sly cunning, evasive, useless seems more appropriate.

  4. Seymour should be despised and ridiculed into a gated community behind a big fence… preferably in Rangipo or Rimutaka… or failing that… Arizona or Alabama

    1. He’s probably the only politician with the balls to do it as well.

      Whatever people think of Winston, he’s a smart politician and can see which way the political winds are blowing.

  5. Our dopey PM told parents to make a marmite sandwich and give their kids an apple, is he going to say that to the businesses and farmers when they put their begging bowl out, I doubt it.

    1. But I don’t like Marmite. Will I be punished or refused other food if I don’t eat it?

    2. It grieves me to say it but I have to agree with all those that condemn his comment as out of touch with the reality of the situation for many parents. In a perfect world all children should be feed and clothed by their parents but the world is not perfect.

  6. The marmite sandwich will come to haunt him just as did Walter Nash’s acid drops.

  7. The last time a country poisoned kids with plastic was the Fonterra/Sanlu scandal in China where they put melamine in infant formula.
    The result, 2 executions, 3 life imprisonments, 2 15 year sentences, and 7 government officials sacked.
    Why aren’t the right calling for such accountability and responsibility here.

  8. If we are letting parents off providing for their own children, we should at least spend the money wisely. Seymour seems to be wasting money on a low quality option. Having said that, Luxon is right. A marmite sandwich is an inexpensive option for parents. Are parents really unable to stretch to that? Seems unlikely.

  9. CoC government finds millions to prop up foreign owned private businesses (salmon farms) but some school kids have to eat plastic contaminated foods.

  10. Seymour did not turn up to his explain meeting on school lunches with Nicky Willis, arrogant chap-let him eat Marmite sandwiches.

  11. I do wonder that alongside its $9.50 each oysters would this sort of food be served at Bellamys for the consumption of MPs like Stanford, Seymour and Seymour’s Lap Dog Luxon????

Comments are closed.