Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

  1. If fossil fuels have any more directly essential use in serving the needs of mankind than by New Zealand’s farming industry; if there is any use that they could be put to that rates a higher priority it would be good to identify it.
    D J S

    1. Flying to European countries to cruise the waterways in luxury whilst penning musings on political history is obviously OK, we all know that, it’s in the Geneva convention probably.
      🙂
      I got a good laugh from the OP, such a clumsy stereotype is just a wind up.
      Fiction certainly suits Mr Trotters grasp of rural life.

      1. Peter and KCC
        I don’t want to knock Chris too hard for his trip overseas ; I did the same last year, but his constant disparagement of the farming community I don’t understand.
        As for the anthropomorphic climate change trip, I accepted like everyone else up till a few months ago when I resolved to try to understand the machinery of it for myself. The concept has not in my mind survived that enquiry. I will have more to say on that in the future.
        D J S

        1. I fear you are too kind.
          This is Mr Trotters second “ignorant peasant” piece in 2 days. If one is going to preach on a topic then one can expect to have their own hypocrisy examined.
          At least farmers are earning a living and generate taxes and national income, Trotters climate change sins are for his own pleasure.
          Isnt it the city dwelling bourgeois that revolutions are against, not the stupid peasants? Trotter might put us right.

  2. Next weeks exchange features non productive baby boomers conversing with regards the evils of agriculture onboard their jet plane as they take an overseas vacation which the current generation of workers couldn’t afford, while contributing to the 2.5-3.5% of human induced global warming from air travel.
    No warbling introduced magpies, just the whine of kerosene fueled turbines and the hiss of processed air.
    It’s a hoot.

  3. lol…plausible indeed…one point however, agriculture (and its practitioners) these days is dependent on fossil fuels.

  4. No offence to Chris Trotter, who is obviously a clever bloke with a formidable grasp of political history, but the purple prose he resorts to occasionally makes part of my brain want to stab itself to death. Less is more, Chris.

  5. Um,… don’t mammals down to bacteria emit co2 when they respire? And isn’t all life on earth carbon based?

    So that would mean in order to lower co2 levels and become a zero carbon footprint globe we would have to kill off all life on earth. Perhaps we should nuke the whole planet as an option .The only problem is we would then have a fair bit of global warming and climate change happening rather fast, I should imagine …

    Perhaps it’d be less messy to just plant more trees…

    Oh wait ,… they produce co2 when they respire…

Comments are closed.