Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

11 Comments

  1. “I stand by the mandates while acknowledging the damage they caused some.”

    This line stands out to me because, yes, nobody was held down against their will, but no, it still was a damaging time for some, nonetheless. More telling, for the damaged – you’re still feral anyway!

    As for threats to politicians, well, to use the diminishing the circumstance rationale of the ‘nobody was held down’ point…no politician was harmed either! In other words, threats were made, lets not diminish this fact, likewise, due to mandates, real hard choices were made too, lets not diminish this point either.

  2. Sadly the dumb lives matter crowd still crow about “Jabcinta” several years after the fact. It seems many of the ferals now have a new pet hate against the govenment- apparently the coalition is responsible for weather modification. If anything all covid exposed was societies untreated mental health issues.

    1. “Untreated mental health issues”? Tut-tut Tinker. Neurodiversity is a continuum, don’t ya know. Methinks the antivax ferals were mostly contrarians- some libertarians – folk who simply dislike authority, folk who don’t like being told what to do, whatever the reason, folk itching for a fight – all it takes is a mandate. But yes, fed by misinformation, disinformation and all the rest. Some antivaxers were not so feral, but otherwise gentle folk suspicious (rightly or wrong) of medical science. But maybe you do have a point afterall. I overheard heard a woman in a supermaket isle telling the person next to them that the vaccines contained material that were ‘magnetic’ and were ultimately being used by governments for control. No doubt just popped up from the rabbit hole. She wasn’t all that wrong however, just wide of the mark: the vaccines did contain material not well understood by most ordinary folk and the purpose was ostensibly control, albeit medical science’s solution to prevent widespread reproduction of the virus.

  3. You just have to look at the comments on The Platform and the TPU Facebook pages to see that NZ is full of hate filled, mentally unhinged bigots and narcissists.

  4. One of the worlds leading cancer experts, Dr Angus Dalgliesh, head of oncology at St Georges Hospital in London, is calling for an immediate ban on MRNA vaccines due to an emerging safety signal which is popping up in a number of recent peer reviewed papers. Novel pharmaceutical interventions have a terrible track record of safety. Pharmaceutical companies have an appaling ethical track record. Our governments indemnified them against liability while at the same time guaranteeing them exponential profits. Taking a cautious approach based on those simple facts alone is completely rational. The damage done to public trust in vaccines more widely by trying to force the covid vaccines on people (no jab no job, no jab no haircut etc etc) may never be recovered from. Was it worth it?

    1. Well, you’d got to ask if Dr Angus Dalgliesh is on to something, possibly a wistleblower, or an outlier, not well supported by peers,
      Novel pharmaceutical interventions have a terrible track record of safety: not necessarily true. Some in the field may vehemently disagree.
      Pharmaceutical companies have an appalling ethical track record: yes, not good, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be ethical opportunists.
      Our governments indemnified them against liability while at the same time guaranteeing them exponential profits: well, that’s probably the case for all pharmaceutical brought to the market.
      Taking a cautious approach based on those simple facts alone is completely rational: again yes, but one has to ask what the ‘facts’ really are.

  5. Most people don’t know this information so not a lot of public trust damage has been done, in my view. And those that do know this information, well, we’ve seen what happens to them.

Comments are closed.