Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. It was a sad day when TV3 (Hamish Carter, Neil Waka, Paul Campbell ect) Largley took over sports commentary. I’v nothing against them persoanally but I understand that these TV’s peronsallities are now largley employed as corperate coms and Keith Quine who was usurped is still doing what he loves.

  2. New Zealand is way to small for the “constraints of a free market” to work at all. It barely works in any but the most trivial cases even in the US.
    Here collusion and population restraints ensure that tiny, co-operative oligarchies and effective, self-serving monopolies dominate almost every sector of commerce.

    Perhaps Sky would like to place their sports content on a free-to-air platform and see how the tie-up with Vodaphone looks then.

  3. “The Fairfax boss has again threatened NZ with huge staff cuts in journalism if we don’t give him his Newspaper Monopoly”.

    Dear oh dear, journalism is for all intents dead in New Zealand anyway, its a bad punchline to an even worse joke.

    Go on then Fairfax, cut away, the shit you put out isn’t worthy of payment anyway. But regardless of which, that would have to be a better outcome than a giant Newstalk ZB!

    Christ what a bunch of infantile fucktards right wingers and their shareholders are when they get denied their whims!

  4. “FREE MARKET FAILS TO WORK” for the consumer, it was set up to only work for the elitists.

    Christ, change the bloody government before we have nothing left to us.

    1. Unfortunately both Labour and the Greens have well-documented histories of cowardice, betrayal and deceit, and the current leadership of both parties indicates we should expect cowardice, betrayal and deceit if either party were to form the core of a new government or be in a position to influence the direction of any new government.

      The more I have seen of politicians, the more convinced I have become that politics is the problem and the government, whichever colour it is, is the problem.

      A change of government simply makes a miniscule change to the distribution of wealth within a dysfunctional and corrupt system which is founded on fraudulent money creation and looting-and-polluting of the environment.

      We don’t need to change the government: we need to change the system. And the people who operate and gain short-term benefits from status quo simply will not allow the system to be scrapped and replaced with something appropriate to the times we live in.

      Therefore, we will continue the great decline which has been underway since the 1970s, with the pace of decline gradually increasing until we reach a critical moment (very likely relating to ability to acquire liquid fuels) after which the system will implode.

      Until that point [of implosion] is reached we must expect more of the same shit that got us into the predicament we are in, whichever party forms the core of the next government.

      1. The critical turning points were after Kirk when off shore intervention in our political system became systematised then Lange the humorous egotist had his fling but brought in a draconian shift to liberalism with Douglas and Lange both demolishing public services.
        Education will never recover after Lange broke up the publicly elected Education Boards who fought for school funding and ran a well managed system.

Comments are closed.