Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

2 Comments

  1. “And therein lies the problem; in the absence of a hard-driving Minister of Health with the energy and willingness to crack the whip over an industry and profession that is completely stuck in a 25-year old mindset, the leadership of the mental health profession in this country will deliver more of the same for years to come, and the strategic willingness of this Government to push for change in the mental health sphere will become another victim of the Ministry bureaucracy and an entrenched profession.”

    Replace “mental health” with “disability support services” and you have accurately described our situation.
    Clark lacks the required body parts to tear down the dysfunctional Misery of Health bureaucracy and neuter its industry collaborators.

    1. Rosemary the MOH is regarded by me as perhaps peopled by second-rate hacks who can’t cut it out in the real world – it’s very frustrating for eg gp’s and some hospital drs struggling to provide optimum patient care, but much worse for patients, or, as they are now known, clients, or customers – or victims.

      Occasionally good men like Dave McPherson here, Phil Bagshawe in ChCh, fearlessly address medical shortcomings in NZ and do something about it, but the systemic shortcomings should be making the minister wonder if the ferrets have been guarding the fowl-house.

      To what extent the MoH is zealously guarding the previous govt’s modus operandi as to who matters also needs to be very carefully dissected, pronto. That is well and truly overdue, as these heartbreaking mental health tragedies keep showing us.

Comments are closed.