Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. Their timing could hardly be worse. The wage subsidies are nearing their end, aren’t they? This is the signal they are sending?

  2. Exactly. Labour should have put Beneficiaries on a living wage.

    As a lifelong union supporter, I have always been appalled by PSA members often being the ones that apply the sadism to our vulnerable citizens that try and get some assistance-if they can get past the security of course!

  3. I had a bad time at WINZ years ago but there are some good people working there and none of them deserve to be shot and killed like the staff in Ashburton. The staff are following the rules set by governments both Labour and National the members of which have had little contact with WINZ as a”client”. I am not an a fan of Labour or Little but if the wages were better they may attract a better standard of worker

  4. not the thugs who guard the doors!

    Can’t say that I’ve ever considered them thugs.

    This doesn’t mean that I agree that they should be there – they shouldn’t. But to change that requires changing the culture of WINZ and NZ to stop showing beneficiaries as bludgers and as the victims of the business community who want to keep wages down so that they’re own bludging, in the form of profits, is higher.

  5. Agree DTB. Martyn watch that you don’t get an infection – the Mike Hosking mania virus.

  6. Workers across the board deserve the living wage. However, beneficiaries need enough to survive on! That is the one glaring omission from Labour’s time in office.

    These security guards may well be needed in the times ahead, as the queues lengthen and new applicants become angry when they discover there is NO real safety net. Many will find that they do not receive enough to feed their children.

  7. It’s about work place safety . Not that yourself or the lumpen proletariat that cause trouble at MSD would know anything about that.

Comments are closed.