Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

4 Comments

  1. Where did all the jobs go….. the answer starts with Thatcherism…

    Why doesn’t Britain have a Huawei of its own? The answer speaks volumes

    The UK’s General Electric Company was a global tech titan in the 1980s. Then it was swept away in the riptide of Thatcherism

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/08/britain-huawei-general-electric-company-thatcherism

    The problem for UK Labour is that they are fighting themselves on many issues with some in the party being completely unable to grasp the fairness, when many in their party seem more interested in giving jobs, voting and opportunities and services to migrants mostly from other parts of Europe, than they are to British born people, who seem fast becoming outsiders and a laughing stock, in their own country.

    It is nothing to do with colour, because many migrants from the EU are whiter than the brits who are a pretty multicultural lot these days. There is nothing wrong with migrants from the EU, but clearly without jobs that were decimated under Thatcher and modern management/stakeholder driven profiteering like General Electric, more plentiful high paid work opportunities have not continued in line with the UK population growth.

    The problem with unlimited immigration it that is becomes about resource control not race. But clearly the remain are not meeting the perceptions and reality of the NHS, housing and jobs that are being run down in many areas.

    Very few people want to live on benefits and handouts for the rest of their lives if they don’t have to, which now seems to be a Labour solution rather than looking at better employment conditions and real high paid jobs for existing people.

    Instead Thatcherism makes people now pay for tertiary education, remove local jobs, bring in migrants that get subsidised by the state for many resources and in many ways undercut the wages that don’t go up at the same pace as other constraints like housing.

    For remain, to bring more people along they had to go with a remain that protected UK jobs and health care and social services, instead of neoliberal thinking of bringing unlimited immigration into the UK, without the practical considerations of how that plays out. Which is to make the state pay for the necessary health care and infrastructures out of debt and existing taxes while continuing to sell off ‘British’ business and contracts to overseas multinationals.

    1. “Very few people want to live on benefits and handouts for the rest of their lives if they don’t have to, which now seems to be a Labour solution rather than looking at better employment conditions and real high paid jobs for existing people.

      Instead Thatcherism makes people now pay for tertiary education, remove local jobs, bring in migrants that get subsidised by the state for many resources and in many ways undercut the wages that don’t go up at the same pace as other constraints like housing. ”

      There’s a lesson here for NZ Labour.

  2. The world is going through the same stresses after GFC as after 1929.

    There is protectionism and there is pandering to popular nationalism by so called strongmen (Mussolini existed before 1929 as did Putin before 2008 as role models for those to come).

    The junkers used the fascists in Germany to crush left wing, and we are seeing something similar today. The use of the term woke (for urban liberals) parallels the use of the term Un-American fellow traveller and Jew in those times (usually to slur anyone for equal civil liberties and human rights for all).

    And it now dominates the political landscape. Xi in China and Netanyahu’s Jewish state of Israel and Erdogan’s Turkish Moslem regime, Modi’s India, Brexit England and Trumps white race nation GOP.

    Multilateralism is in full retreat from the WTO to China in the south China Sea Tuirkey in Syria and Israel’s annexations. And so is collective security, thus the age of regional hegemony has returned.

  3. I read this with scepticism after the opening sentence.
    Stating something is an axiom that has no relation to your primary argument, whatever that is, gives no import to your message whatsoever.
    The biggest issue is that the left are fractured and have no common message that the populace can relate to.
    The right have a simple message, greed is good and money or religious beliefs will save you.
    But they are fearful, and until the left can unite and use this fear to create a more progressive society the left will be steamrolled into the tarmac.

Comments are closed.