Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

One Comment

  1. Russel’s statement is very much on the conservative side of where things are.

    The 3 to 4 degrees forecast needs a time frame as there is nothing in the presents action plans that will limit the rise to those numbers.

    The flywheel effect from accumulated GHG emissions to date and the environmental destruction caused by feeding humans ignorance and greed, looks to be unstoppable at many levels. Dreams and words won’t stop it.

    A few thousand years may see the beginnings of long path relative stabilisation again but not with humans playing a part. Resources humans rely on will be well depleted within a generation from now.

    As the methane release accelerates then we may be looking at billions of humans displaced and dying off within a generation or so. The human numbers have been well past overshoot for many decades.

    The criminality of powers controlling the network of organised resistance to change, is mind blowing and psychopathic.

    NACT’s inaction is still very evident in Bridges statement criticising the govt somewhat tentative moves to curb fossil fuel extraction and use, and instead NACT oppose a ban on fossil fuel exploration and will repeal that ban.

    Instead they suggest a discussion group be set up.
    Such PR nonsense may appeal to dystopia voters and ignorant deniers of well established information on human impact on the our planet.

Comments are closed.