Similar Posts

21 Comments

  1. Look at Paula Bennett.
    Her identity was that a Maori woman from a poor working class background.
    She escaped the working class. What is she today?
    A Maori woman who is deputy PM enforcing the ruling class politics of the NACTs onto many thousands of working class people of all genders, ethnicities, sexualities, abilities and ages.
    The few who have escaped into the middle class are using their identity as as privilege to mask the fact that their positions as professionals and bureaucrats are paid for by working class people.
    Unless the working class unites all of its diverse fractions around gender, ethnicity, sexuality, ability, age, etc etc,. we will never be strong enough to replace the social system that oppresses and exploits us and threatens to burn us up in nuclear and climate Armageddons.
    Of course, that unity cannot succeed unless the most oppressive attitudes and practices towards those oppressed by gender, ethnicity, sexuality, ability or age, are eliminated in the working class.
    But that is a task for the organised working class, not for middle class politicians or bureaucrats who tell workers that they too can escape their class into the middle class on the road to human extinction.

  2. I like what you’re writing , Martyn,… its a breathe of fresh air.

    Truth is , we have gone full circle back 80 or more years ago when the Left was mainly concerned with issues of economics, – and out of that sprang the fundamentals of equality.

    Not the other way round….

    For a long time now it has swung too far the other way , and in fact,… was applauded by the neo liberal right wing. The simple reason was because it posed no harm whatsoever to the main agenda which was financial and legal control of a country ,… and as a bonus for the neo liberal planners…. could be used to foster division and yes, .. individualism.

    It was a perfect tool for them to use as a Trojan horse. And we can see that today in the Labour party with the remaining neo liberals.

    Its important to discern we are NOT fighting a battle with either the Left or Right ,- but one of economic and political ideology. You can be either Left, Center or Right,… but not adopt neo liberalism.

    We used to have such a situation pre 1984 before Rogernomics.

    And it worked perfectly fine. So fine , in fact ,… we were one of the highest per capita income earners in the world in the late 1960’s. And it was under a system called ‘ Keynesian economics ‘- named after John Maynard Keynes.

    And there was no real difference between National and Labour regarding economics then , it was the accepted form of social democratic economics.

    It is all very fine having individual freedoms and rights, but when that gets ahead of the core economic situation and becomes the main focus and then is used politically by those whose agenda has nothing to do with those identitarian’s ,… barring being used as a clever front for political assimilation… when family’s sleep in vans and cars and garages and the average working persons wage is well known to be below the actual cost of living , when our health , education etc is being tampered with and left to run down…

    THAT ,… is when there needs to be an evaluation done very smartly to rectify that imbalance and to prevent it being used as a tool by certain bodies , lobby groups and think tanks that are hostile to social democracy , its egalitarian values , and of a basic and fair sense of play for all.

    That evaluation has not happened in NZ , at least for over 30 years,… for a number of reasons… fear that the Left ‘ needs’ these neo liberal subversives on board with them , fear of upsetting the business community , … and as a consequence… the betrayal of the very people they claimed to represent.

    And this is where the ‘ missing million ‘ voters are at. They see this , … and are not as easily fooled as these arrogant politicians would like to believe they are.

    1. ..another good reason not to vote Green…the ‘holier than thous’ have unfortunately colonised the Greens….they used to be a genuine band of non conmformists, free thinkers and activists imbued with the environmental values of the Maori and our ancestors

  3. ” interested in purifying their safe hug space”
    What a brilliant way of putting it as we descend into 3rd World status (hat tip to Frank’s latest).

    I too have reservations about both WJ and Greg O’Connor, but its unfortunate that the likes of Weka and others on TS (whose contributions are more often than not worthwhile), aren’t up to recognising human failings – especially when they’re acknowledged by the offender. Especially (in the case of WJ) there have now been two apologies.
    I’m not sure they realise just how fucking counter-productive they are. Egos get in the way as does all that “how very dare you, I paid my dues” attitude shit (and I mean shit s h i t SHIT S H I T)
    Maybe Poto really is the perfect specimen – there are a lot of them about, strutting their immaculate stuff

  4. Have to say I’m not a fan of Jackson, I don’t think he speaks for urban Maori, and I don’t think that Poto is harming the Labour party by voicing her concerns.

  5. Have Labour not learnt the lessons from Clinton’s defeat?
    Class war not identity politics is needed.

  6. Great article Martyn, I am so glad you can recognize and are standing against the cancer that identity politics has become on the left.

    It has just provided a distraction from the true issue of class inequality.

    1. Totally agree, Libbys.
      Identity politics will destroy Labour if we let them.
      Andrew’s standing by Willie Jackson for a number of valid reasons is good, and all strength to him continuing.

  7. I disagree. Backing Jackson will be a vote changer, a net loss for Labour. I’ll not vote Labour if he is a candidate. He is unfit to be an MP. At best he can’t think on his feet, quite clearly, and will not offer anything valuable to parliament. At worst he’s woefully ignorant about rape and rape culture and will do damage as an MP.

  8. It’s a stretch linking Bernie with Little. Bernie offered a shift to the left (considering USA’s context). Whereas Andrew Little offers bugger all class politics. Furthermore, Bernie’s campaign included identity politics – look at how he included BLM and feminist critiques.

    Let’s stop pretending Andrew Little and Labour are class warriors just because they distance themselves from identity issues. Little and Labour are neoliberal without the identity politics. They wouldn’t know class consciousnesses if it slapped them across their face.

    Let me know when Little becomes a class based politician…he can’t even offer a decent state housing policy in the middle of a housing crisis!

  9. People think of Willie Jackson as a liberal lefty. But you’re not liberal, are you?
    No, I don’t even know if I’m a lefty any more. I was a union official for 16, 17 years, so obviously I was part of the left. Now I see myself as pro-Maori, but not in an in-your-face type of way … and sometimes that doesn’t go down well with the left-wing agenda.
    http://www.noted.co.nz/archive/listener-nz-2005/willie-jackson/#.WJZRZX2RPkg.facebook

    So I get it that he’s pro Maori…but it seems a bit arrogant of us all to think that being pro Maori automatically puts you in the lefty- Labour camp, as if Maori couldn’t possibly be anything other than left wing.

    My concerns with this so called ‘broad church’ approach…is where the heck are Labour these days other than firmly in the centre…and exactly where has that got us….

  10. “That isn’t to say that Identity Politics isn’t valid and shouldn’t have a role in defining the Left, of course it does and it should…”

    It isn’t valid. It’s a Political Suicide Pact.

    It is Neo-Liberalism’s greatest invention.

Comments are closed.