Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

26 Comments

  1. Until we fix our own record on human rights I don’t think we have the moral right to criticize any country on their internal affairs.Stop filling our jails with young maori and our run down motels with poor people

    The problem we face, with regard to having an independent, or fully neutral, foreign policy is that when push comes to shove would our 5 eyes allies allow us to stay on the sidelines

    1. Maori in NZ prisons are there because they broke the law – Uyghurs in concentration camps in China are there because they are Uyghurs.
      Another contrast for you to chew over Peter is Maori are to have ‘enhanced’ access to surgery in NZ hospitals vs Uyghurs being taken to a local hospital for forced organ harvesting . . this may escape you but that constitutes quite a big difference between the two and their approach to human rights.

      https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2021/06/china-un-human-rights-experts-alarmed-organ-harvesting-allegations

    2. Totally agree with you Peter, let’s get our house in order before lecturing others.

  2. Mostly agree but i suspect Xi jerked the chain and Chipkins took his licks. However we will be glad of our positive but neutral stance with China when the US dollar is jettisoned by OPEC+. It will be a a landslide into depression for the US who has done little to nothing for the South Pacific region.

  3. Nanaia Mahuta has been very supportive of America’s race war against the Chinese people and their government. Good thing Hipkins went instead.

    1. Can’t believe that I am in agreeance with the resident bomb-chuker on here but the treatment of the Uyghurs appears to be no different to the Jews (and many others) during WW2 and most of the world turning a blind-eye to this for monetary gain is simply reprehensible.

  4. Here’s something which is never discussed: Was independence even a good idea in the first place?

    Does anyone really believe that separation from New South Wales actually resulted in a better outcome? Or how about refusing to join the Federation as the seventh state in 1901, particularly since Dunedin was being seriously proposed as an alternative to Canberra as the capital?

    And was becoming a Dominion at all even a good idea, particularly since all British Subjects were later stripped of their rights? What if the country had remained a British Overseas Territory or a U.K. Dependency?

  5. Yes, relations seemed very friendly.
    Then, as they say.
    The crocodile always appears to smile before it eats you.

    1. Yes! And he can probably use concise words to define a ‘woman’ to his citizenry too! .. Unlike our own piss-weak pm who is totally delusional to think that pissing off kiwi chicks has ever worked out well in the polling booth.. (or is even a good idea generally)..
      Well done, great post, lol

  6. “Choyna” as Winston Peters famously lampooned ex Natzo leader Soymun Bridges lumpen accent.

    What’s the problem with China all you tory fuckers? The Brits, USA, and Japan all tried to do China over and ultimately failed.

  7. It helps that Chippy said that Xi wasnt a dictator, and something to the effect that even if he was, its wasnt any of our business.

  8. Fear not, we will never be under China’s control while we choose to be under Washington’s control. Yep, we are as independent as a ten day old baby, this is why despite being our most important trading partner, we love to shout sweet nothings in China’s direction, and we do this with pride and utter fearlessness. Trading partner and fearlessness, yeah this makes sense! Unfortunately for us, we have a penchant for swallowing Washington’s perennially unverifiable kool-aid, hook, line and sinker.

  9. Happy to trade with India but no mention of their cast system which locks people out of society no matter how rich or educated they become . No country is free of racism some just hide it better than others. Racism is alive and well in NZ so we ate not in a position to point the finger.

Comments are closed.