Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

16 Comments

  1. Wasn’t Hipkins saying he couldn’t support having a Treaty Commissioner that could choose not to follow legislation passed by Parliament?

  2. Labour and TPM may both be opposed to the current government, but they are not natural allies. Labour competes with TPM for the Maori seats, preferring it’s own candidates to those of TPM. More importantly for Labour, any association with a strong TPM will become an attack point for the current government. The path to power is through the centre, where Labour needs to win and where TPM is seen as less palatable.

  3. Despite everything, Hipkins is electable (Starmer is still most popular PM in latest poll). TPM are extremists and worst than ACT. If Labour can get the Māori seats back, TPM are gone. As we know, most Māori don’t vote TPM.

  4. Just watch China exploit any tribal co governance or splits from government sovereignty.
    Look to the Cook Islands for how NZ will fall to Chinas hybrid war on the pacific.

  5. Chippy is wrong to rule out a commissioner outright. How that Commissioner operates cld be debated but having one is a good idea. Who does that sausage roll chomping ordinare think he is, even if he doesn’t fuck it up again next election, he’s not the PM forever and the role of Commissioner would be permanent. And this recent treaty debacle, which is wasting tax payer dollars when the govt is slicing and diving away public money, is the reason why the role is necessary, as TPM rightly posit.

  6. The only focus of Hipkins is to make sure the left loses, either by getting in and doing absolutely nothing left wing, or by throwing it to National.

  7. It takes a thick-skinned Labour panel to keep Chippy on and ignore wisdoms flowing from this blog and elsewhere. The thoughts coming from this direction are worthy of absorption. But the thickos and turncoats that brought in the Neolib and trade treaties with as many small grenades sticking out from them so they look like a Covid19 germ, that was when Labour lost its mind. Addressing the politicians as real people to be admired is a waste of time. They wander bewildered but putting on a face of effrontery enabling them to keep going.

    Read about James Croll who could rise from poor beginnings to put forward a theorem on the earth after doing a lot of self-education; presumably he was taught to read and that enabled his future. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Croll

    Wouldn’t it be good if Labour realised their lacks and that they are still in the primer level. Actually reading individually and having discussion sessions, as was done in early days of the uprising of the working man, now that could be the answer. Not deciding in an arrogant way that they are unrecognised geniuses. Evidence is not convincing.

    More understanding of our systems needed. https://theconversation.com/the-fight-for-education-doesnt-stop-when-working-class-boys-get-into-university-92153

    New methods for those proposing to be politicians?
    Discussion is important to learning in all disciplines because it helps students process information rather than simply receive it.Leading a discussion requires skills different from lecturing. The goal of a discussion is to get students to practice thinking about the course material.
    Discussions: Teaching Strategies Indiana University
    https://citl.indiana.edu › … › Discussions

Comments are closed.