The things we need to believe to accept Simon Bridges assurance that he knew nothing about State spying
Simon Bridges secretly meets with oil interests to ram through a new law prosecuting deep sea oil activists and misleads Parliament about that meeting, all the while his very agency who is pushing through that law change is committing unethical spying actions against Greenpeace, the Green Party, the MANA Movement and local Iwi protesting possible oil pollution.
Yet Simon Bridges knew nothing about that spying?
How believable is it that Bridges becomes suddenly so ignorant when it comes to the day to day applications of those civil rights abuses?
