Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

11 Comments

  1. The problem is, most people are mercenaries and willing servants, conditioned from a young age on, to be just that, and to jump at every opportunity to earn money, that is also, or even though, they may be forced to make a living.

    People do things for opportunity and money, they then get harmed, in paid employment, and otherwise.

    I ask, how many out there, will be taking the risk to be injured, locked up, otherwise harmed, standing up for theirs and others’ rights?

    Most choose to rather be employment and business opportunists, and hence we have what we have, we have few if any, who sacrifice fighting for justice, for collective well being and for progress.

    That is a major problem, and hence the low numbers of union membership. My sympathy for mercenaries and slaves and servants is limited, given their decisions.

    1. I was chemically poisoned on my job in Toronto as a kiwi expat in 1992 and still today live in the shadow of chemical ‘aviodance’ so much that i cannot enter any place without a chemical survey of the air quality first now other wise I may be severely injured.

      I have severe Chemical sensitivities. Called MSM (multiple Chemical Sensitivities) or EI (Environmental Illness) EI is not a term I prefer as it is not specific as MCS is.

      I am now referred to as “a miners canary” where i am so ‘reative’ to any chemical that I can tell when it is unsafe to enter any workplace or other location.

      Most medical communities around the world are totally ablivious to chemical poisoning and the affects to humans so we fall through the cracks and are often called ‘nut-cases’ or ‘it’s alll in our head’ but my adverse effects to chemicals is well documented in OSHA/NIOSH data bases as a lot of chemicals are ‘sensitisers’ so why are we not caring about workers around these chemicals now????????

      It is likely that chemical companies don’t want lawsuits levelled at them?

  2. When we have a “flexible labour market” instead of people working in jobs, the de-humanisation of workers into “labour units” becomes possible. When one “labour unit” is “lost”, another is inserted in it’s place.

    This is the free market/neo-liberalism distilled to it’s essence.

    I hope Winston Peters is being truthful when he asserts his priority as rolling back the neo-liberal regime. Because lives are literally at stake here.

  3. Yes Mike but what I’m not seeing here is a call for the restoration of the importance and authority of unions. Where were the unions in Pike river? How can a union organiser say to management that a workplace is not safe and workers are not going in there until it’s checked and fixed – without retribution?

Comments are closed.