Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

26 Comments

  1. Brooke Van Velden is simply another nasty bullhorn for the grand old National Party far right wingnuts.

  2. How on earth does a so-called “economic bounce back” happen when you want the government to cut spending. Now just take a second and think that through one more time before replying, or just consult professor google for the correct answer. I’ll wait.

    1. Quality hasn’t been used to describe Public Health for some time. What will be different this time?

  3. Its actually amazing that these far right wing freaks are still at it in the middle of a global pandemic and looming global economic downturn and mass unemployment. Talk about their complete disconnect and sense of self entitlement …

    Absolutely staggering.

    These are some of the same sort of reasons that lit the wick of the revolutions in Europe and removed monarchy’s… do these nutjobs ever learn?

    1. Very true Wild Katipo. It’s like they are locked into their little worlds, not understanding how much pain they cause, until someone/something forces them to actually open their blinkered eyes.

  4. Seems to tie in with the disjointed and self contradictory articles in the Herald today abount deficits and the magic money tree. Interestingly any of the key concepts that didnt support the argument were simply ignored or not mentioned even where this caused a major contradiction. Oddly the fact that many of the issues the author raised could also be solved by modest tax increases on the better off was not mentioned either. Hence the overlap with Act.

    1. The Herald writes with agendas in mind, thus will always have a lopsided rightwing approach. Think Hosking having to pay out Tamahere for comments made that lacked any evidence and prior, John Armstrong’s attack on David Cunliffe. Think of those writing for the Herald, Hosking Young, Joyce, Hawkesby, Key etc and tell me it’s not slanted and with a hidden agenda?

    2. Just to add, why are these pieces not hidden behind the paywall? If people want Hosking/Joyce /Key’s opinions then hide them behind the paywall like most other things.

  5. Hopefully Epsom drop David Seymour like a hot potato. The Act party has become dangerous and holds ideologies that even National would find hard to work with.

    Time for David Seymour to follow Winston Peters out of parliament.

  6. The truth is she is itemising the cuts National want to do but hide in a vague policy talk of slashing $80 billion in ten years.

    So between ACT and National they the same old same old.

  7. ACT have a curious idea of freedom – a mindless dummy without a will of its own – a poor representation of the principle, but a splendid model of the kind of voters they’re hoping for.

  8. Any chance that act are getting donations from the US nra? Pauline Hanson gave it a go.

Comments are closed.