Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

  1. Martin. There is one point that should be above your other 3. NZ gives more non citizens permanent residency on a per capita basis than any other oecd country bar Israel. We know that Israel does it to maintain a demographic majority and keep the Palestinians in the minority. Why do successive NZ governments do it? To keep the population ponzi scheme going with ever rising property prices to keep the free money coming to the landed class AND to keep the indigenous people of Aotearoa demographically marginalised lest they rise up and demand true partnership as per Te Tiriti.

  2. yeess! i always blame the stupid ###(choose your poison of word\s)#@# that allow the exploitation and proliferation of immigration not immigrants. they didn’t let themselves in ..

    tamaki has issues .. and those that listen to him probably helped pay for Hannah’s $90,000 diamond ringand so on and so on.

    1. Tamati is a lying parasite of the worse order preying on weak minded victims and their families.

    1. Trev this country and many others colonised was founded on racism using assimilation policies. Isn’t that why you are here and many other poms are still coming what exactly are they running away from apart from classism ?

      1. The grass always seems greener on the other side of the fence. In the 70s a trip around to the otherside of the world for £10 was too good . I did not feel like a colonialist just happy to be in a country that was new and open to fresh ideas. Racism has never sat well with me and I try not to label people good or bad judged on their believes without finding out where those believes come from

  3. Every country has an immigration policy. It is not racist to have an immigration policy! In NZ it might be a good idea to have an immigration policy that works for the people who live here rather than prioritising those still coming and takes into account current resources like housing, water, transport, social services, justice, schools, health care, that are already stretched to the point that places are running out of water and we have record homelessness and record low wages.

  4. You never here the left (or right) asking for the migrants caught exploiting others, to be deported as part of our immigration laws… or unions or poverty commentators asking why visas are left open for 3 years for unemployed migrants to stay in NZ and bring in spouses and relatives contributing to poverty outcomes for them and others and the risks of criminal activities, and a huge burden of infrastructure overloads in NZ. Likewise hire companies able to bring in hundreds of unemployed workers from around the world that they profit from for the NZ visas, who get stranded here demanding to stay, and nobody say’s boo and the settlements with the firms are confidential and they are not prosectuted… What makes me sick is how the lefties have also become addicted to this practise because they can make money by getting people to sign up to unions and essentially while getting a 0% wage increase can instead fight to keep people with little skills here in NZ which long term is a major poverty factor. Unions are essentially collaborating with the rich listers and low paid industries, to bring in more workers so business don’t have to pay more or increase their workers conditions.

    “A Glen Innes Pak’nSave owner, worth an estimated $65m, was paying one of the lowest rates as far as collective agreements go in Auckland supermarkets, FIRST Union’s Mandeep Bela said.

    The union is in the process of bargaining at Hastings Pak’nSave where workers recently resorted to strike action. At mediation, the owner offered a 0 per cent pay rise for the 2018 year, Bela said.”

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503462&objectid=12108780

    Meanwhile they unions find purpose ‘keeping the labour hire companies’ going and construction workers at $20 p/h which is hardly going to drive innovation in that poorly performing industry…

  5. I agree with most of this but not the idea that the middle class built the property speculation bubble to get rich. It’s a symptom not a cause, but – and it’s a big but – what it has done is create an army of people who think they need to defend neoliberal economic settings

    I think the middle class was encouraged to get into property speculation as a piece of social engineering and it’s worked well but we should appreciate that they did it in order to maintain their living standards as real-world wages have declined.

    I’m not sure how to do it but I’d rather we try to get them to see the big picture in this as opposed to turning them into an enemy that we have to fight. Besides which, there’s no way their kids will be able to maintain these living standards so some of them should feel sympathetic.

Comments are closed.