Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. We have this year watched France ejected from its African colonies. They had resources such as uranium bought for pennies in the pound. How this relates to New Caledonia I’m unsure but I’d bet that the French ego won’t want more humiliation.

  2. Hahah, hilarious. Ben couldn’t be madder that free countries are going to kick the NATO occupiers out of Kanaky.

    1. ‘New Caledonia is already an outlier, one of the few remaining European colonies left anywhere in the world. However, the Pacific is rich in resources and France is unlikely to hand power back to the indigenous people.’
      Isn’t someone forgetting about American Samoa, Guam, and Hawai’i?

  3. “New Caledonia is already an outlier, one of the few remaining European colonies left anywhere in the world.” Ben Morgan

    Ben could have/should have qualified this statement by writing New Caledonia is one of the few remaining ‘Direct’ European colonies. Imperialist powers these days prefer to rip off the global south through neo-colonies i.e. exploiting indigenous people and resources in partnership with corrupt local rulers, dictators, autocrats, sometimes even nominal democracies.

    How neo-colonialism and imperialism, in this case French imperialism, works

    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gaffer-biswas-1477b4b_did-you-know-france-with-its-fourth-largest-activity-7081651646300114944-CWm4

    Did you know? France, with its fourth largest gold reserves of 2.436 tons, doesn’t even have a single gold mine within its borders. Meanwhile, Mali, a country once occupied by France, doesn’t hold any gold reserves in its banks, despite having a staggering 860 gold mines and an annual production of 50 tons.
    This stark contrast raises important questions about historical injustices and the economic disparities that persist today. The colonial past of France and its exploitation of resources in its former colonies have left a lasting impact. While France benefits from its gold reserves, countries like Mali, with abundant natural resources, struggle to reap the rewards.

    1. “Only the oppressed can feel their chains only they can define what is a fetter” Rosa Luxenburg

      Ben almost makes it seem that colonisation is something benign, that indigenous resistance to it is unjustified.
      Ben’s back handed support for French imperialism is sickening.
      Ben conveniently ignores the brutal reality of Western imperialism as experienced by those oppressed by it. The racist genocidal war France fought to keep Algeria as a French colony, or the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior so the French imperialists could keep detonating nuclear weapons in Mururoa are just a two examples of the the nature of French colonisation, that the Kanak people are living under.

      1. You can have anti poverty, anti colonisation, or pro environment but you can only choose 2 of them because being a rupturing online victim sister destroys the whole game and ruins any future hope.

        1. Absolute nonsense. You just need to look at civilized, modernizing, well-run countries. Beijing gone from having the worst air pollution in the world to comparable to Los Angeles. They’ll pass Christchurch going in the other direction in the next decade.

  4. They had three referendums as per an agreement to settle the country’s status, with only one ‘yes’ (pro independence) result being needed to win.

    The ‘no’ vote won two times in a row, by small but not tiny margins.

    Having lost twice, the ‘yes’ lobby decided to boycott the last vote in order to undermine its legitimacy, with COVID as the rationale/excuse. ‘No’ went on to win by larger margins.

    If it had been a single vote, it’d be fair to point to the unusual circumstances of the third vote. But the point of having three votes was to ascertain if the country was truly 50/50 with one offs affecting the result, or a clear and persistent majority for ‘no’.

    There was a clear and persistent majority for ‘no’. Sorry pro-independence lobby- you lost, fair and square. At this point, rioting because others get suffrage is just refusing to recognise a democratic mandate.

    But colonialism, etc, etc, etc.

    1. That’s where shaky ground begins. One person one vote sounds great until you are a minority, disadvantaged and dispossed. To give us in A-NZ credit we have gone down the Tiriti path. Unaddressed wrongs fester.

    2. Absolute nonsense. French rats support zionism, thus french rats must be driven out of everywhere.

    3. That’s not how decolonisation works.
      That’s like a referendum on whether NZ should dissolve the national and labour parties. Result not in doubt.
      French re cooking the books, as desperate colonials are want to do.

Comments are closed.