Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. US v Houthi…. (from a military blogger). Having watched the US tasks force operate from a safe distance (as in not where they need to be) this made me laugh.

    As Armchair Warlord
    @ArmchairW
    noted a few days ago, a US destroyer’s “last line of defense” — its 20mm Gatling cannon — was called upon to defeat an incoming Yemeni anti-ship ballistic missile that the destroyer’s air defense missiles had failed to intercept.

    They’re damn lucky they hit it.

    Most of all, they’re damn lucky there weren’t three or four incoming instead of just one.

    And bear in mind, we’re talking about whatever antiquated ASBMs the Yemeni have managed to beg, borrow, or steal over the years.

    These are a far cry from front-line Iranian anti-ship missiles, and Chinese and Russian ASBMs are on another level altogether.

    The Phalanx “CIWS” (Close-In Weapon System) can reportedly fire 4500 rounds per minute. But its magazine only contains 1550 rounds!

    So a little over 20 seconds worth of firing time before its ammo is exhausted.

    The longer “Operation Whack-A-Mole” against Yemen continues, the more likely a US warship is to get hit — which, if/when it happens, will finally open many eyes around the world that have hitherto been blind.

    1. Indeed. Tragic that they didn’t sail HMS Queen Elizabeth into harm’s way before the propeller broke.

  2. The US and China are squaring off to fight what China hopes will be a limited war to increase Chinese influence and access to raw materials and resources of the Pacific.
    A limited conflict, to retake Taiwan for instance, or aggressively assert Chia’s dominance of the South China sea, in conflict with the US and other Western powers will not remain contained for long.
    Any outbreak of violence between these two superpowers will more likely than not, swiftly spin out of control, to escalate to a point that one side or the other determines they are in an existential fight for their very survival. Once that point is reached, all bets. are off.

    New Zealand’s best bet is to have noting to do with this bullshit, and declare ourselves the Switzerland of the South Seas.

    “Nuclear submarines can defeat China’s ‘area denial’ strategy, travelling unseen beneath the ocean they are much harder to find and destroy than aircraft carriers. The can also dominate enormous areas of ocean, blockade China’s navy and stop its maritime trade. Additionally, the US and UK’s submarine technology is generations ahead of Chinese anti-submarine warfare. AUKUS submarines will be a powerful deterrent to Chinese naval aggression.” Ben Morgan

    Really?

    Sounds like a lot of wishful thinking to me.

    A number or reputable sources have rubbished that claim.

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2144721-chinas-quantum-submarine-detector-could-seal-south-china-sea/

    China’s quantum submarine detector could seal South China Sea
    By David Hambling

    22 August 2017

    …..Beijing has long wanted to change the rules of engagement in its waters. Earlier this year it drafted new laws requiring any foreign submarine to get approval before entering Chinese waters, and once there, to stay surfaced and display its national flag.

    If they are detected by this new technology and ordered to surface under this Chinese law, will the AUKUS fleet react defiantly? If AUKUS submarines, like US and Western warships that defiantly operate in the Strait of Taiwan now, don’t obey the Chinese edict to surface, will China resort to force to make them surface?

    ‘Transparent Sea’

    https://breakingdefense.com/2024/01/transparent-sea-aukus-looks-to-ai-quantum-in-hunt-for-chinese-submarines/

    AI analysis of sensor data, including new kinds of quantum-based detection, could give a lethal edge in undersea warfare — to either the Australia-UK-US alliance or to China.
    By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR.
    on January 29, 2024

  3. Free Tibet
    Free Inner Mongolia
    Free Xinjiang/East Turkistan
    Free Northern Vietnam & Paracel Islands
    Free Manchuria
    Free Hong Kong
    Free Jimmy Lai
    Free the good people of China
    Free YouTube
    Free Pooh Bear
    And keep Taiwan and Indo Pacific region Free
    Free from the evils of the CCP Chinese Criminal Party

  4. I think Carrier groups have long distance eyes & ears so won’t ever be caught by surprise by a Missile/Drone-Swarm Attack & have plenty enough of weapons systems to intercept. I think the fact that a Carrier Group can launch it’s own Missile/Drone barrage is an Equaliser for any would-be Attack. There is no reason there can’t be Swarms of Drones carried on the Carriers. If US is not working on dedicated Missile/Drone Carrier Ships they’re sleeping on the job & I don’t think US IMC is sleeping LOL.

    Best way to fight Fire is with Fire. Add Drones, Drone-Ships & & Missile-Boats to your Fleet just another Element of your Carrier Group. Best way for a Carrier Group to fight UAV is to have their own UAV Interceptors.

    1. Carrier groups and the aircraft carriers they protect, may have been the super weapons of the last century, but as a way of projecting military power over the horizon, aircraft carriers are vulnerable to modern weapons systems. No matter what weapons you add to your carrier fleet to protect them, big fat relatively slow moving target,s like aircraft carries, are sitting ducks for hypersonic missiles. None of the defensive measures mentioned by CG above are effective against hypersonic weapons, a weapon system in which China is the recognised world leader.
      This new reality is the driving force behind the US and the West to collectively engage in a crash program to build sub-surface warships.

Comments are closed.