Similar Posts

Leave a Reply to Ximonde Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 Comments

  1. The clean car discount was funded by a levy on more polluting vehicles such as the Ford Ranger : taxpayers were never subsidising EV purchasers.

    This government clearly does not have a sensible energy plan at all.

    Best managers of our economy? I think not.

  2. Why are so many people so damned “Mean”? They chose to live in a rural area, unsupported by public transport! To begrudge those who chose to live closer to cities/jobs etc. shows how bitter and twisted they really are. Step up you horrible lot. No one foresaw the lunacy of Trump – we are all victims in the end. As for our Trump supporting CoC, let’s not feel sorry for them. They have brought it on themselves with their spite and the cancellation of everything good that the Left installed which would have been a God-send to them now. Bet they still don’t get it! Again, you reap what you sow!

    1. It is not rural people being mean, it is just a perception that the regions are underfunded and ignored. Although I live in a rural area I, personally, support more investment in urban areas, to encourage more people to live there. That not only helps the environment, with fewer car trips etc, but stops the countryside getting filled up with commuters to the cities.

      In addition, rougher rural roads make people drive more slowly, cutting fuel use, and also making the roads safer for cyclists like myself.

  3. Why spend money unnecessarily on subsidies for public transport when people are flocking to it anyway .Just like EV subsidies. People are now buying them willingly without government intervention.

    1. Oh FFS Trevor, one minute your pro petrol, now pro EV. Typical of how the right can turn on a dime because they only react. Labour and the Greens were proactive with EVs and of course the right screamed blue murder. Now they are reacting to the fact that fuel will never be finite. Then again National have always lived in the 80s.

      1. I am not pro EV I am pro choice . Most of my wealthy friends have EV cars but they would have been able to buy them on their own .The subsidiary
        was a nice bonus. Thank goodness there is plenty of oil in the ground so do not worry about supply . It is needed for so many things beside powering cars it is vital we can get it out of tye ground and moved around the World

    2. Trevor, you could apply your exact same argument to the logic of those tax cuts for corporate landlords and tobacco companies.

      Borrowing to fund tax breaks for the already wealthy (and sorted) is very different to subsidising EVs or public transport.

      The EV subsidy was funded by a levy on polluting vehicles such as the Ford Ranger.